Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Terayon - S CDMA player (TERN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: George who wrote (1490)	1/18/2003 1:28:13 PM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1658

I respectfully note that your declaration offers no counter argument what-so-ever. I'm not surprised at your failure to offer an argument, since I certainly cannot think of a way that one could justify the writing of a short report in which one declares a company doesn't offer certain very important products to its industry, when in fact it DOES. Pluvia's declaration that TERN offered "solely" proprietary, i.e. non-DOCSIS products was then, and remains now, false(and indisputably and objectively criminal in nature, by both common sense and common law). Certainly, this falsehood was central to his short report # 2, and as a central part of such a report, it remains, I say again, obviously criminal indeed. While I agree with his argument that DOCSIS standardized products are virtually all important for modem/headend sales in the U.S., the gist of his report went beyond this simple point about standards in the U.S. The gist of his report was that TERN wouldn't likely ever make itself a market with DOCSIS products, and to suggest that TERN had willfully lied to/mislead investors about the potential for inclusion of its proprietary S-CDMA technology into the DOCSIS standard. Now we see that TERN's formerly proprietary S-CDMA technology has not only been made a part of the DOCSIS standard(which doesn't surprise me, as I noted it wouldn't when I was called names for saying so), but as a result TERN perhaps currently holds the very advantage it expected to achieve. I suggested in the past that Pluvia, Pat Mudge, and etc., were making mountains out of molehills(or less) when considering the honesty of TERN officers in relation to their stated expected inclusion of S-CDMA into DOCSIS, and frankly it is much easier now to back up the case I made; I believed the officers of TERN were not lying, and it certainly seems TERN came through for me. So I would suggest that truly, the gist of Pluvia's argument has been blown away where Terayon and DOCSIS, are concerned. Dan B