Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (158331)	1/17/2003 9:04:21 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576124

I would say that non-proportional representation is evidence of discrimination. I would not. Or at most would consider it weak evidence and only in extreme cases. Tim Edit - And even if it is I would not get the evidence for the goal mixed up with the goal itself

To: TigerPaw who wrote (158331)	1/19/2003 8:53:40 AM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576124

Tigerpaw RE.. would say that non-proportional representation is evidence of discrimination. The evidence may of course have a reasonable explanation but it is valid to have it explained.< What are you trying to say here. The fact that unless, the proportional representation is way out of wack, there always will be other factors, thereby Tim is right, that proportion representation is only one basis to be used, and should only be used in a group setting. Individual cases require you to look at individual abilities, discipline, and temperments.