Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RON BL who wrote (344388)	1/17/2003 10:11:48 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

If it was ok to attack Milosevich how can it not be ok to attack Sadaam. I did answer the question, you apparently can't read the posts. Milosevich was in an active, unprovoked, attack at the time. If you remember back to '91 there was only muted protest against an attack on Saddam, because at that time he was not only a threat, but was an active aggressor. Now he is only an ageing used-to-be and Junior George is the aggressor. TP

To: RON BL who wrote (344388)	1/18/2003 12:53:08 AM
From: steve dietrich	Respond to of 769670

At least you have to evaluate the wars either party engages in by their intentions. I actually favored Clinton administration moving to oust Saddam (of course they never did), but if they had of their motives would have above reproach. Also they wouldn't move in to capitalize on the oil, as we know the Bush Administration will!