Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (158353)	1/17/2003 11:11:23 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1587853

But in this instance, better qualified whites are being blatantly passed over in favor of those who are not just marginally less qualified, but those who are GROSSLY less qualified. I don't see that at all. It would appear that nobody that isn't qualified is even considered. ( I finally noticed the sidebar explanation of the points scheme ). SAT isn't even in that list, so either they don't look at it at all (which I doubt) or there is a big piece of the puzzle missing. So a a perfect SAT score gets 12 points, what does a perfect score minus one get? It would appear that of the 150 points only 40 can be due to these special and miscellaneous items, so that means 110 points come from somewhere else. This incomplete writeup is deceitful. (check tomorrow for a correction that states that 120 points come from a perfect SAT score, that is my guess) TP