Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alomex who wrote (151587)	1/18/2003 1:14:35 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

actually fox is something of a blessing. It shows these nasty conservatives for what they are, mean spirited and all of that just like the stereotypes. You may not be a liberal, but you can still dislike Sean Hannity and O'Reilly. The problem with AA is it assumes a black and white world which is a thing of the past, thats my issue with it. Otherwise I'd be for it.

To: Alomex who wrote (151587)	1/18/2003 4:40:11 PM
From: Victor Lazlo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

<<Fox news on the other hand goes out of their way to not bring liberal voices in the show, and when they do, the host of the show goes after them. >> The first part of this is BS. They invite plenty of liberal s on. Many liberals turn down the invitations, for various reasons. But you're right on the talkie shows the hosts usually play attack dog. It's analogous to Katie Couric and Matt Lauer on the today show lobbing friendly, softball questions to people like Hillary Clinton, and setting them up to spout their biased drivel without the nuisance of any serious questions.

To: Alomex who wrote (151587)	1/20/2003 8:43:31 AM
From: craig crawford	Respond to of 164684

>> Other networks make an effort to allow quite diverging opinions in the same show. From a George Will or Bob Novak to a James Carville or Michael Kinsley. << bob novak (jewish only by birth), james carville, and michael kinsley (jewish) are all from crossfire. the fox news equivalent to crossfire is hannity and colmes (jewish). how can you say that alan colmes (jewish) is not a diverging counter to hannity just like on crossfire? >> Fox news on the other hand goes out of their way to not bring liberal voices in the show << alan colmes (jewish) is not liberal? you need to come up with a better argument. greta van sustern is not liberal? geraldo rivera (jewish) is not liberal? i even consider bill o'reilly to be somewhat liberal on some issues. far too liberal for me anyway. the point that you are all overlooking is that the so-called conservative bias you complain about with fox news isn't even true american conservatism. it is a perverted pro-israeli form of jewish conservatism. i guess your idea of a conservative is phil donahue. apparently you believe that fox news has a conservative slant because they won't put a marxist pinko like doanhue on.