SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James F. Hopkins who wrote (2022)1/18/2003 2:40:13 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 25898
 
Well now don't go gittin' all fast forwarded about all this here impeachment stuff. Y'all got ta realiz' thet sum o' da durt that would be thrown at the Shrub would natchally land on Awl-Slick Dick. I doubt he'd have one shred of credibility with the Amurrican voter during n' after a good impeachment and trial and I can damn sure bet that the impeachment could be strung out to a convenient time, oh, say, Halloween, 2004. That would just about take care of the mess. Now woodnit? Tie da bastuhds up for the duration and then just shove 'em out de door in a real election.

-Ray



To: James F. Hopkins who wrote (2022)1/18/2003 2:44:16 PM
From: PartyTime  Respond to of 25898
 
True. Impeachment would have to cover both the Prez and VP. That'd put Speaker of the House Denny Hastert next in line and the president pro tempore of the Senate next, whom I think is now Ted Stevens.

infoctr.edu

Now that I think about this, I'd certainly prefer a Hastert/Stevens team over the current Bush/Cheney one.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News