SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Galapagos Islands -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (22145)1/18/2003 4:27:28 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 57110
 
Iraq. Had Bush restricted this Afghanistan, there would be no problem. But he decided to go after Iraq.

The problem is that it is not at all apparent that Iraq actually is a threat to the US. Yet, anyway.

And there is no evidence he has WMD. At least not yet.

So it appears like Bush is after Iraq for reasons other than the proclaimed ones. Oil immediately comes to mind, particularly considering Bush's and Cheney's backgrounds.

And in spite of the claims of certain posters, Americans are not fond of imperialism.

So externally and internally Bush appears to be launching an unjustified war.

Maybe there's hope.
Message 18459570



To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (22145)1/18/2003 5:55:23 PM
From: gypsees  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 57110
 
Did you notice the story said hundreds of thousands of Americans in several cities oppose the war but the two pictures show a total of 3 people - maybe 6 if you count possible protester's legs?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News