Diamantling Neumann's Jewish Apologetics: Part II
OK. Let's see. Let's go down the list of Neumann's area list of a lack of Jewish power. Again, Jews represent 2.5% of the American population:
1) "ARMIES." Is the locus of power in armies, or is it located with those who tell armies what to do? Is the foundation of power to be found among the likes of African-American and Latino soldiers crawling under barbed wire, or the Jewish coterie of warmongering White House/Pentagon individuals who NEVER SERVED IN THE MILITARY, like Wolfowitz, Perle, Feith, and other obsessive Israelists throughout the White House, Pentagon, and State Department? By 1996, 4 of 7 CIA directorates were also Jewish, as well as the head of the CIA, John Deutch who was pardoned by Bill Clinton before an investigation into Deutch's classified CIA documents at home could be finished.
[See extensive examination of Jewish power in government here].
2) "OIL." No Jews in "oil fields?" If Mr. Neumann means actually dropping sweat at oil rigs, he's probably right. If he means CONTROLLING and DIRECTING oil rigs, it's another story. Shell Oil isn't "oil" enough for Mr. Neumann? Marcus Bearsted, who was Jewish, founded the firm that became Shell Oil and his son "became chairman of the Shell Oil Company after his father." [GREENBERG, M. p. 68]
Baltimore's Jacob Blaustein founded Amoco (American Oil Company.) By 1957 the Blaustein's were the eleventh richest family in the United States. "One of the family's favorites philanthropies is the American Jewish Committee, and for many years Jacob was its honorary chairman." [KREFETZ, p. 83] Blaustein, said World Zionist Organization president Nahum Goldmann, was "a big oilman and notorious anti-Zionist who later became a friend of mine and a great friend of Israel." [GOLDMANN, N., 1978, p. 36]
In Detroit, by the 1980s Max Fisher was "one of the richest and most influential men in the country." [FLAX, p. 64] His millions began with the Marathon Oil company and spread to other investments, including United Brands and real estate ventures. "His prodigious funding for Jewish causes has put Fisher on a first name basis with every prime minister of Israel ... Fisher's annual gifts to Jewish causes alone have amounted to more than $500,000 [a year]." [FLAX, p. 64]
John Schiff, also Jewish, "served through the 1970s as a director of such well-known firms as Getty Oil." [ZWEIGENHAFT, p 35] Getty? Getty? Someone say Getty? In 1993, Leo Liebowitz; president and CEO of the Getty Petroleum Corporation, was charged by journalist Robert Friedman with being in cahoots in a tax cheating scam with a chief in the "Russian Mafia," [NATIONAL PETROLEUM, p. 20] which is mostly Jewish. (According to one state department official, ALL major "Russian" mafia tracked by the U.S. government have Israeli passports].
Even the renowned Getty Museum, founded with funds from the non-Jewish oil mogul, J. Paul Getty (and with $4 billion to play with, the richest museum on earth) has consistently had Jews at the economic helm. In 1998, after 17 years, Harold Williams left the presidency of the J. Paul Getty Trust. Williams, notes George Goodman, was "raised in a Labor Zionist home in East Los Angeles." [GOODMAN, #2, p. 142]
The new president of the J. Paul Getty Trust was another Jewish administrator, Barry Munitz, formerly the chancellor of both the California State University system and the University of Houston. [GOODMAN, #2, p. 144] The new Getty Center opened in 1998, designed by Jewish architect Richard Meier and built at a cost of $1 billion.
Elsewhere in the oil biz, August 2000, three Israeli-based companies, the African-Israel Group (at 21%), Rosebud (at 19%), and the Alon Israel Oil Company (at 60%) owned the American operations of the Total Fina oil company. Fina includes 1,700 gas stations, refineries, pipelines, terminals and other holdings, and even partial control of 7-11 markets at 170 gas stations. [BERGER, S., 10-3-2000]
In France, Henri Deutsch, also of Jewish heritage, "owned one of the two or three largest French petroleum companies and pioneered the development of aviation fuel." [GREENBERG, M., p. 69] In 1999 French-born Philipe Reichstul (also Jewish) became president of Brazil's largest company -- Petrobas. It is an oil company. In 2002, Isaac Yanovich, a businessman from the private banking sector was named president of the state oil company in Colombia.
In Russia, Mafia-linked Jewish mogul Boris Berezovsky controlled 80% of Russia's seventh largest oil company which merged in 1998 with another Jewish-owned oil firm (together called Yuski) to create "the world's largest oil company in terms of reserves.") [MCMAHON, p.3] Yet another Jewish Russian money mogul is Roman Abramovich. The Warsaw Voice (headed by Jewish publisher and editor Andrzej Jonas) noted in 1999 that he is "the CEO of the powerful Sibneft oil group. A popular joke in Moscow says that one must count one's fingers after shaking hands with Abramovich, who has for years been associated with Berezovsky's financial group." [ZYGULSKI, p. 8] Oil magnate Leonid Nevzlin became head of the Russian Jewish Congress in 2001. He and the aforementioned Mihail Khodorkowvsky "formed one of the first successful private banks in Russia in 1989. The two then went into the oil business together, and now run the YUKOS firm -- Khodorkovsky is in charge, and Nevzlin is his deputy." [GORODETSKY, L., 5-23-01] Then there is Mikhail Mirilashvili (a.ka., Misha Kutaisskey), who "is one of the biggest shareholders of the local branch of LUK oil." [KORALYEV, VLADIMIR, 10-11-2000]
As Jewish scholar Betsy Gidwitz noted in 1999:
"That Jews control a disproportionately large share of the Russian economy and Russian media certainly has some basis in fact. Between 50 and 80 percent of the Russian economy is said to be in Jewish hands, with the influence of the five Jews among the eight individuals commonly referred to as "oligarchs" particularly conspicuous. (An oligarch is understood to be a member of a small group that exercises control in a government). The five oligarchs of Jewish descent are Boris Berezovsky, Mikhail Friedman, Vladimir Gusinsky, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, and Alexander Smolensky. The other oligarchs are Vagit Alekperov, Vladimir Potanin, and Rem Vyakhirev.) Perhaps the most famous (and simultaneously the most infamous) of the oligarchs is Boris Berezovsky. In common with most of the other Jewish oligarchs, Berezovsky controls industries in three critical areas: the extraction and sale of a major natural resource, such as oil, as a source of great wealth; a large bank (useful in influencing industry and transferring assets abroad); and several major media outlets (useful for exerting influence and attacking rivals). He also controls a significant share of the Aeroflot airline and the Moscow automobile industry." [GIDWITZ, B., 9-15-99]
3) "AUTO PLANTS." True, the Mr. Neumann's "sinews of reality" will not find many Jews on an automobile assembly line where Jews are probably as rare as finding diamonds the size of footballs on the floor with the metal shavings. But, just for a sampling, by 1965 two Jews -- Sidney Weinberg and Frederick Cullman III (the Chairman of the Board and CEO of Philip Morris) -- even sat on the board of the Ford Motor Company, [ZWEIGENHAFT, p. 32-33] something rather astounding given the fact that the company founder, Henry Ford, is considered by the Jewish community to be the most powerful and influential anti-Semite in America's history. (By the way, in France, "the Citroen, one of France's most popular cars, is named for a Jew [Andre-Gustave Citroen] who was a pioneer in France's automotive industry ... During World War I he produced munitions for the French government, but at the war's end he turned to the mass production of automobiles.") [GOLDBERG, M. H., 1976, p. 108-109]
In the merchantry world around automobiles, Jews have founded everything from Midas Mufflers and Manny, Mo and Jack to Firestone Tires.
4) "FARMS." Jews have a traditional reluctance to getting dirty, especially in agricultural labor. It's true. Look it up. Jews have always been an urban people, zeroed in on the financial spheres of culture, where real power lies. But Paul Fribourg's tenure as the CEO of Continental Grain might count for something. There are also Jewish moguls like Charles Bluhdorn whose Gulf + Western corporate monster owned 8 percent of the arable land of the Dominican Republic." [BAGDIKIAN, p. 30-31] And if we might stretch "farms" to include the concept of "real estate," Jews are kingpins in this field.
5) "MINES." Probably the best known American mining families are Jewish ones, although their mining roots are largely unknown. They are known in the public eye because the Hirschhorns (Washington DC) and Guggenheims (New York) used their fortunes to build famous museums to house their art treasures. There are also Jewish moguls like Ira Rennert, an active Zionist, whose Renco Corporation was listed as the 51st largest private company in America in 1997. Holdings include the Magnesium Corporation of America which was declared by the Environmental Protection Agency in 1998 to be America's "top dumper of toxic chemicals." [ASSOCIATED PRESS STATE AND LOCAL WIRE, 4-19-2000]
Has Mr. Neumann ever heard of the left-wing magazine "Mother Jones?" I think so. Where have the primary funds for its existence come from? Surprise, surprise. A Jewish mining fortune. Adam Hochschild, Mother Jones' Board Chairman and an heir to millions of dollars, kept the magazine going for years with his philanthropy to ameliorate the guilt he had for his capitalist dad. His father, Harold Hochschild, was the wealthy Jewish cofounder of an international mining syndicate with holdings from Africa to Appalachia. [See Adam Hochschild's biography]
How about diamonds. Aren't those mined? Exploited Africans risking their lives in mile-long holes for pennies doesn't count? The Oppenheimers' monstrous De Beers conglomerate isn't anything? Jews have always had an international monopoly in this field, and there's been at least one book by a Jewish scholar about this fact.
6) "FORESTS." No Jewish business interest in forests? How about Charles Hurwitz, who is also a United Jewish Appeal - Federation official? A few years ago Hurwitz was noted for his role as majority stockholder in Maxxam, the company that owns Pacific Lumber. Environmentalists were fighting this company's plans to cut down some of the last remaining old growth Redwood trees on private land in California. As Benjamin Stein notes, "Charles Hurwitz's catastrophic takeover of Pacific Lumber.... resulted in some of the worst environmental atrocities of all time against first-growth redwood trees." [STEIN, B., p. 114] (Hurwitz's Maxxam empire rules over 110 subsidiaries, including Kaiser Aluminum, McCullough Oil, and Simplicity Patterns).
In fact, Jews have a tradition of dominating the timber industry in Eastern Europe. As Jewish scholar Salo Baron notes, "During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries domestic commerce (in Poland and Lithuania) as well as export (timber, grain, furs) and import (cloth, wine, luxuries) were for the most part in Jewish hands." [BARON, EHOJ, p. 227]
Jewish dominance of the timber trade (and many other industries) was the case in pre-communist Russia. As W. D. Rubinstein notes: "A number of important industries were very disproportionately owned and organised by Jews. They included textiles, sugar refining, flour milling, saw mills, brewing and alcohol, tobacco, and the leather manufacturing industry; in commerce, the grain and timber trade; banking; shipping and transport; and mining -- industries from which Jews were not barred by law. Such statistics as exist show that the Jews often far exceeded their percentage of the population in these fields. For instance, Jews owned about 182 of 518 join-stock sugar companies (35 per cent); 69 out of 106 sawmills in the northwestern areas (68 per cent); and so forth, based on very scattered statistics. By 1878, 60 per cent of the grain export from Odessa was in Jewish hands; according to the 1897 Census, 886 of every 1,000 persons engaged in commerce in Russia's northwestern provinces were Jews." [RUBINSTEIN, WD, 2000, p. 6-7]
7) "OCEANS." What does Mr. Neumann mean by "oceans?" Who owns/controls the oceans? If we take, for example, cruise travel across oceans, it is not only a Jewish monopoly, but an Israeli one. The Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz noted the following in 1998: "The meteoric rise in Carnival Cruise's worth has been matched by similar growth for the company's major competitor, Royal Caribbean ... What the two companies have in common, besides their arena of business, is Israeli ownership ... Last summer, the two companies waged a fierce bidding war to purchase another cruise firm, Celebrity. The winner was Royal ... Remarkably enough, Celebrity also belongs to the 'Israeli Club,' as 50 percent of its shares were held by a shipping firm controlled by the Recanati family." [LIPSON]
8) "ROADS." What does this mean? Who owns/controls "roads?" WASPs?
9) AIRPORTS. What does this mean? Who owns/controls "airports?" If we look at the airline industry, we find some interesting things. In recent years, the Jewish Pritzker family's Marmom Group has controlled both Braniff and Continental Airlines. After taking over Trans World Airlines (TWA) the company president, then C. E. Meyer, Jr., called famous Jewish corporate raider Carl Icahn "one of the greediest men on earth." [BROCK, p. 171] By 1998 Icahn was attempting to take over Pan Am airlines. In 2002, Jonathan Orenstein's company (Mesa Air Group) sought a 38% stake in U.S. Airways. [ DE LOLLIS, B., 8-16-02, p. 6B]
Recent Jewish airline CEOS have included Gerald Greenwalt of United Airlines and Jeffrey Katz of SwissAir. (Korean Air flight 85 was almost mistakenly shot out of the sky over Alaska on the day of the World Trade Center jet attacks. The Korean Air operations chief was David Greenberg.) [LEVIN, A., 8-13-02, p. 5A]
10) "MEDIA." After listing the above subjects of alleged Jewish noninvolvement and disadvantage, Neumann then has the audacity to say this: "Even in the media, their [Jews'] power is exaggerated." (Financial world too. The Rothschilds strangling European banking monopoly, Paul Warburg's centrality in the creation of the Federal Reserve, Michael Milken and his list of cohorts, Jewish prominence on Wall Street and investment banking, and on and on are apparently figments of the "anti-Semitic" imagination?)
So Jewish power in mass media -- the lifeblood of culture -- is exaggerated. Really? Mr. Neumann doesn't follow up with any evidence that Jewish media power is exaggerated; it is enough to just say it. As usual in this flippant argument, he notes non-Jewish media moguls Rupert Murdoch, Ted Turner, and Steve Chase as power kings who prove (?) Jewish mass media influence as an "exaggeration." But read Murdoch's biographies. You will find that Murdoch was surrounded by New York Jews in his rise to power, including ABC's Leonard Goldenson, and Murdoch is accredited with being more Zionist than even his Jewish business partners. The president of Turner's CNN at its founding was Maurice Schonfeld. In 1999 Brad Siegel became head of the Turner Broadcasting System and in 2001 Walter Isaacson became head of CNN. CNN itself was subsumed by Time-Warner, with Gerald Levin at the helm. When Steve Chase's AOL merged with Time-Warner, it was also Lewin in charge.
Mr. Neumann might have added Bill Gates to the slim list of media mogul monsters who aren't Jewish. But then he would have to mention Steve Ballmer who has taken Gates' place at the head of Microsoft. Ballmer's mother is Jewish, he is philanthropist for Jewish causes, and Ballmer is heralded by the Jewish community as the richest Jew in America. How about Conrad Black, British media mogul? He's not Jewish. But he is married to Jewish Zionist Barbara Amiel, and when Black bought the Jerusalem Post it became editorially skewed to the far Zionist right.
Hollywood -- one of the key influences over the past century in the formulation of public mores and values -- has always been a nepotistic Jewish fiefdom, from top to bottom . Is that questioned by anybody? MGM, Paramount, Columbia, Warner Brothers -- all Jewish-founded. All Jewish-led. When Jewish scholar Patricia Ernes noted in 1980 that 70-80% of the membership of the Screen Writers Guild were Jewish, no big deal, right? Jewish convention holds that 80% of all professional comics are Jewish. Meaningless, right?
Jews built to power ALL three American TV networks (Paley at CBS, Goldenson at ABC, Sarnoff at NBC). Coincidence, right? It's completely meaningless to point out their ethnic allegiance, right? In 1973, Jewish scholar Daniel Jay Epstein found that 21 of the top 36 TV news producers and editors were Jewish. Coincidence, right? Who cares? (Maybe someone looking for a news producer job?)
And, yes, all over the Internet "anti-Semites" note the Jewish root of the owners and controllers of the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, etc. Of course, to popular convention, those who point out these facts are bigots, despite the fact that in Canada Izzy Asper's much-publicized ham-handed, censorial Zionist dictates over his monstrous media empire (CanWest, decried throughout Canadian journalism) seem to be aimed at trying to prove that the Protocols of the Elders of Zion wasn't fiction but was based on him.
Meanwhile, while its impermissible to count Jewish noses in the lists of the powerful, Jews have been in the vanguard of attack against "white" or "WASP" or "Christian" power/influence in any and all realms, both by legal means and its open access to Judeo-centric media venues. It's been a free forum of attack and now that the more obvious Jewish nemesis is quickly rising as Arabs/Muslims (thanks to American Jewry's beloved Israel), we have Jewish guys like noble "civil rights" lawyer Alan Dershowitz arguing that its time to start torturing people. Nathan Lewin, prominent Jewish American religious leader, also joins in to add that it's time to murder family members of suicide bombers (i.e., "terrorists.") Read the mainstream Jewish chorus -- is it a sin to say the 'J' word? What other word would you use if this coterie isn't all Israeli? -- on the opinion page of your local newspaper.
Mr. Neumann isn't terribly interested in the subject of Jewish power in American culture, yet he writes about it to dismiss it as fantasy. Truly, concerted ignorance cannot be changed if someone is intent upon a veritable conviction of self-delusion. But details about Jewish hegemony in the mass media are readily available here, to whoever cares to look. Here too is documentation about Jewish preeminence in the art world, the intelligentsia, and popular culture generally.
Jews dominate the mass media and, yes, folks like Mr. Neumann apparently would prefer that this "exaggerated" fact be kept in debatable disrepute. Or, better, dismissed to the provenance of the Ku Klu Klan, skinheads, neo-Nazis and stereotypical "anti-Semitic" bigots of all sorts where the political world can be kept rather simple: good and evil. Rational and irrational. True and false. He thinks its better to focus on Jewish power in oil, "the ocean," and the Oregon woods. Of course, apparently unbeknownst to him, there are prominent Jewish power-mongers to be found in such places too, although not on as great a scale. There is the usual Jewish argumentative undercurrent here. Jewish victimization tradition (i.e., Jewish identity itself) emphasizes -- as does Mr. Neumann -- that Jews ARE NOT found in these fields (despite the fact that, as earlier noted, and countering traditional notions of institutionalized Jewish disadvantage in Europe, Jews actually dominated some of these realms in parts of that continent).
But, even if there were not a single Jewish individual of power in such realms, what would it mean per control and/or influence upon popular culture? Does the owner of a coal mine influence what you believe about the world? Does a utilities CEO have influence upon what you think about Christianity? Does the owner of a woods in Colorado have any reason to care about what you think about Israel? And even if he did, what could he do about it?
To even the most naive student of the social and political world, the center of culture -- the nerve center, the brain -- is the mass media, government, and the opinion formulation apparatus that defines the world in consumer society. Its premise of presentation -- whatever its subject -- has long been veiled in the guise of "objectivity." In the steady erosion of religious and traditional values (as the mass media and its appendages have become the American pulpit), the mores of materialist hedonism have been spread in their places. Who is responsible for this? Coal miners? The owner of Aramco? Is the fact that people of Jewish heritage dominate the pornography and smut trades, like so much else, coincidence?
Mr. Neumann declares there isn't enough evidence for him to assert that there's a problem in American culture with too many ethnocentric, propagandistic Jews in positions of power. Well, how come he hasn't investigated the issue at length himself? When popular culture actually FORBIDS any sort of critical inquiry into ANYTHING Jewish, let alone an investigation into Jewish influence in popular culture (that's "racism," that's "anti-Semitism," that's "bigotry," ad nauseum), what kind of indicting evidence does he expect to find in mainstream annals about it? Who would get a university grant to study "Jewish power in the mass media?" Who would get academic funding to study "Jewish influence in government?" What journalist would dare to write an article about the top tiers of the mass media hierarchy with asterisks next to Jewish names? (Nonetheless, Mr. Neumann demands a "two-columned" list of Jews and non-Jews to prove Jewish Jewish dominance in "any" field. He will find one here, about the major studios in Hollywood, researched by a man, John Cones, who -- as consequence -- repeatedly faces the charge of "anti-Semitism" by the Jewish Thought Police for doing so). The Thought Control is total, the "pathologization" process ("anti-Semite") into this realm of intellectual (and moral) endeavor absolute. (A related two-columned comparison list of Jews and non-Jews may be found here, this in the context of the self-protective Judeo-centric mass media's profoundly disproportionate focus on corrupt priests and not rabbis).
For the dissenter, the one of open intellectual inquiry, once he dares to exert his inalienable RIGHT to look frankly at whoever wields authentic power in American society, he is confronted with a package of surprises, facts that can only cause profound consternation. What's all the more troubling is that these facts have been systematically screened from popular/public examination, and -- as a realm of "connect the dots" information -- are known by virtually no one.
Example. Exhibit A:
1) the three individual Jews built NBC, CBS, and ABC to power (Sarnoff, Paley, Goldenson)
2) Hollywood is a Jewish nepotistic fiefdom and has always been so (Jewish dominance in this field can not be refuted, and rarely is -- even by Jewish commentators, but merely qualified by apologetics: "i.e., so many are Jewish, yes, but that doesn't mean anything.")
3) by 1999 four of the five largest American media conglomerates were headed by Jews
4) the four current commissioners of professional baseball, football, basketball, and hockey are all Jewish (Selig, Tagliabue, Stern, Bettman)
5) five of the last eight American poet laureates have been Jews (Kunitz, Pinsky, Nemerov, Strand, Brodsky)
6) In a 1974 book, The American Intellectual Elite, Charles Kadushin's determined that, based upon subjective opinion within rings of the American intelligentsia, 15 of the top 21 "intellectuals" were Jewish, overwhelmingly located in New York City and New England.
7) By 1998, five of eight of the Ivy League college presidents had "Jewish parents."
8) According to Jewish investigators, an estimated half of the donations to the Democratic Party's national campaigns are Jewish.
9) In 1996, not only was the director of the CIA Jewish (John Deutch), but so were four of the seven CIA directorates.
10) For most of the 20th century, a Jewish power elite (and attendant Jewish money), from Joel Spingarn at the head of the NAACP on down, essentially ran the African-American civil rights movement for Jewish ethnocentric benefit.
And on and on and on and on, across the spectrum of social and political influence and control. Jews are just "smart," right? They're just "hardworking," right? The fact of their ethnicity (which, by self-definition, infers a extremely strong intra-allegiance) is entirely meaningless, true?
Forget "power." Use your own word. Whatever it is, is this kind of concentration healthy for "multiculturalism?" Is this healthy for democracy? And why isn't anyone talking about it? Why? Because popular culture holds ANY critical investigation into ANYTHING Jewish to be taboo, a situation that is result of a careful social engineering process for the last few decades. This socialization process -- championed throughout today's culture, from the mass media to academe -- declares that Jews are humankind's consummate sufferers, the Holocaust is the indisputably "unique" measure of disadvantaged victimhood, Jews are collectively entitled to "reparations" of all and every sort, and virtually any criticism of Jewry is inevitably held to be the first push off the hill towards a second attempted genocide. Hence, for perhaps the first time in modern history (short of totalitarian dictatorships and blatant censorship by ruling royalties), a power elite (and Jews are also the wealthiest ethnic group in America, which is a fact that is also publicly very much guarded) is held to be beyond the pale of criticism, thereby guaranteeing increased entrenchment and expansion of its ethnocentric power.
Look at xenophobic, racist Israel, for decades almost completely free from criticism. And look at the Jews who stand out today like blinking neon signs -- Wolfowitz, Perle, Feith -- who are so incredibly influential in running America's intolerant, warmongering, Israel-centric foreign policy. And look how we are all forbidden from noting that those who spearhead such destructive policies to American interests are Jewish.
This kind of profound Jewish influence isn't just in America. It is very much a part of Jewish history and entrepreneurial/exploitative tradition. Isn't it an interesting fact that in 1999 a Jewish author (Betsy Gidwitz) for Israel's Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs declared that Jews were estimated to control 50-80% of Russia's economy, and that an oligarchy of eight men (five of whom are Jewish, at least two of whom have dual Russian-Israeli citizenship -- Berezovsky and Gusinsky) were instrumental in creating what is Russia's capitalist government today? In a truly free society, that item -- and the sample flurry of facts I've mentioned above -- would be worth WIDESPREAD debate and commentary, towards understanding these facts' essential meanings, whatever they are. Instead, we have monolithic condemnation of the mere citation of such facts as -- by Thought Police definition -- a categorical manifestation of "bigotry."
If one of the premises of our multicultural society is the continued deconstruction of the "white" power structure towards a democratization of culture by percentages of ethnic entities, why is one subdivision of this "white" category (Jews) BEYOND the same deconstructive attack? Why, as in Hollywood, has Jewish nepotism NEVER faced critical investigation, whatsoever? And why is any attempt to do so emphatically considered to be grounds for intellectual and moral marginalization from mainstream discourse?
The answer to such questions, of course, has to do with who controls the terms of discourse for what IS regarded as public morality -- civil rights organizations, advocacy groups, the mass media, government, the publishing world, and so forth. Not coal mines.
Is this Jewish ethnic chauvinism -- evidenced throughout American culture and other countries -- a manifestation of true "multiculturalism?" Is it also a manifestation of genuine democracy, except to the degree that entrepreneurial capitalism allows itself to be co-opted by wealthy, self-promoting "special interest groups" who stake out far, far greater claims to power and collective advancement than their own fair share (in this case, 2.5%) of the population merits?
No. This whole outrageous scenario is a fraud of the first order. It is fraud not merely because Jews are afforded the luxury of such an extraordinarily disproportionate influence in mass culture towards their own ethnocentric interests. Thanks to "anti-hate" laws, massive "anti-bigotry" indoctrination programs, and Jewry's chronic victim status, they have even succeeded in creating protective walls around their own acute ethnocentrism, hiding it from public view. Ditto for examining Jewish power in influencing what you believe and know. It's taboo to even mention these things. Even worse, modern American Jewry has instituted a sociopolitical milieu in which they can declare their RIGHT to maintain this status quo of disproportionate wealth and influence in a virtually legalized -- and totalitarian -- secrecy. |
