Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (66910)	1/19/2003 3:57:40 AM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

When are we going to get some 'straight talk' from the President...?? Bush doublespeak on Iraq and taxes insults our intelligence BY RALPH MARTIRE Editorial The Chicago Sun-Times January 18, 2003 I wonder when we'll get straight talk from the president about the big decisions he's making for our country. For instance, take his public stance on Iraq and try to square it with his stance on North Korea. For months, Bush has been telling the American public to prepare for war with Iraq because of the threat from Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction and alleged sponsorship of al-Qaida. Yet, for months Bush had a special intelligence unit search for a link between al-Qaida and Saddam, only to come up empty. Now UN inspectors can't find a smoking gun and have asked for more time. In spite of the inability to develop any evidence of a real Iraqi threat to the United States, Bush remains bellicose, calling for ''regime change'' as the solution for the bad man of Baghdad. Meanwhile, North Korea not only admits it has nuclear weapons, it has broadcast its desire to export the technology. Intelligence reports verify North Korean nuclear capability. A few weeks ago, the United States intercepted a North Korean shipment of missiles to Yemen. Despite the seemingly more immediate danger North Korea poses, Bush is offering a peaceful resolution with Pyongyang. To date, there's been no cogent rationale offered for using diplomacy to defuse the real threat posed by North Korea, and war for the thus-far imagined threat posed by Iraq, just doublespeak. The president's penchant for misinformation doesn't end with foreign affairs. Consider his economic stimulus and tax cut package. You know, the one he doesn't want to hear ''class warfare'' arguments about. Whether or not you call it class warfare, ignoring the effects of a tax change on different income levels is, in economic terms, ignorant. Before you can make a tax change that will actually improve the economy, you have to know who has really benefitted from the economy. Most Americans haven't. From 1979 to 1999, on an inflation-adjusted basis, 60 percent of the American work force worked longer, harder and more efficiently. They also took home less money at the end of that 20-year span than they did at the beginning. That's almost two-thirds of our country working harder for less. The truth is, virtually all the growth in our economy during that period went to just the wealthiest 5 percent of income earners. But wait, there's more. The largest sector of our economy by far is consumer spending. Low- and middle-income working families are our best consumers. Putting two and two together, you'd assume that when the president claims his tax proposal is fair to all Americans, the relief would be targeted to the vast majority of Americans. You'd also be wrong. According to the Brookings Institute, no matter how you slice the president's recent proposal, whether it's the break on dividend taxes or accelerating income tax rate reductions, the lion's share of this 10-year, $674 billion boondoggle goes to the wealthiest 5 percent of income earners. You know, the same folks who sucked up all the growth in our nation's economy for two decades. Exactly how the president can keep a straight face while claiming this proposal benefits most Americans isn't clear. Just the other day, when discussing the Iraq situation, the president said he's tired of all the lies and deceit. I assume he means the ones emanating from Baghdad, not the beltway. If he's tired of spin, how does he think the American public feels about being fed a load of hooey to justify a war? And if the president doesn't like the nomenclature of class warfare, then he should stop engaging in it by pushing tax breaks that overwhelmingly benefit one class--the wealthiest--while ignoring most working Americans. ____________________________________________ Ralph Martire is executive director for the Center for Tax and Budget Accountability. suntimes.com