Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LTK007 who wrote (18928)	1/19/2003 2:44:09 PM
From: lorne	Respond to of 23908

Godfrey. Thanks for that, explains well where you are coming from on the iraq thing. You want sadam gone as much as anyone you just don't agree with a war at this time to remove him. You said...." It is this emotion i am by-passing for i see too much ill coming from the removal of one man now, when 12 years ago it would have been a "piece of cake".".... Bush sr. would have been at odds with UN if he had went into Bagdad after sadam. UN resolution called for iraq troops to be removed from Kuwait only. You said...." Terrorism is a vast amoeba, it is not located in Iraq."..... No but IMO a good portion of terrorist support is located in iraq. You said...." This war carries a significant risk of enhancing the support base for terrorism."..... No offence but this kind of thinking will only strenghten terrorist resolve. islam terrorist must be shown in no uncertain terms that terrorism is a losing cause and they will not be appeased ever again. And sadam is a necessary start. And it must be in the arab world the head of the snake.