Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (14620)	1/20/2003 12:32:00 PM
From: zonder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

You're goofy Still trying to hide your ignorance by mudslinging? because every time I make a point you switch terms SHOW WHERE?!?! This is the third time you are saying this and the third time I am asking you to show where I have done any such thing. Are you saying that the same type of quantum fluctuation that supposedly became the universe has been observed in the experiment you are referring to? Yes or no will suffice. Yes. (Since you asked for a one-word answer. The theory is a bit more complex, of course. And your "same type of quantum fluctuation" (as if you know of a couple of more types) does not help clarify your question.) Why can't you just read the two links I posted? Are you afraid you might lose your ignorance? Don't worry. Ignorance is not a binary state. You will not really "lose" it when you read a bit on subjects you know nothing about... I'll try one more time then I'm giving up on you Z. Oh please, don't give up on me Greg... I was learning so much from you <g> Jeez. It took us a week to get you to the point where you might understand some basic rules of quantum physics. From now on, I hope you can do a Google search as well as the next person, and read a bit on your own.