Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (2585)	1/20/2003 5:31:29 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Respond to of 25898

Re: Does anyone not think the Have/Have Not thing didn't have any kind of influence on why 9/11 happened? Several million people believe that it was strictly a "Haves" affair. I.e. the Haves LIHOPed in order to impose greater controls on everyone else. 9/11 was certainly convenient for the creation of vast new police state powers domestically and military adventurism abroad. Could the U.S. have garrisoned 1,000 troops in Uzbekistan without 9/11? Undoubtedly not. But now we have that garrison there, and Halliburton has the profit from the logistics contracts there. How convenient. And what a shock to find out that the garrison is located on a proposed right-of-way for a major oil pipeline development, much as was discussed in Brzezinski's "The Grand Chessboard". I'm certain it's just a coincidence.