Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: skinowski who wrote (64045)	1/20/2003 6:35:43 PM
From: At_The_Ask	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

I have it on pretty good authority that the pattern he is trying to show becomes invalid if t2 is lower than t4(which it is). It's supposed to be an ED with an extended 1st wave(which it's not). IMO he is stuck on the concept that the august up is an a and that the oct move is the c of a flat(which it's not). The reason he wants this to be so is because he wants the big "epicenter of wave three down" to happen. I don't see this as possible. Guys that are promoting this count are just dead wrong. They are looking for what they want to see rather than letting the charts tell them whats happening. There isn't enough room on any index between here and zero for such a wave except for possibly the dow. Imagine the NDX 100. It's already lost 80% of it's value. How can it have a giant three down without hiting 0? What catalyst causes such a move? Only a nuclear terror incident could cause something like that.