Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (158571)	1/21/2003 3:41:58 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578927

Ted, <if Asians are in near parity with whites in terms of education and income as you and Harry proclaim so vehemently, why do you think they should be treated differently/separately from whites when it comes to this issue of AA?> You have me mistaken for someone else. I do NOT think Asians should be treated differently than whites. Nor do I think blacks and Hispanics and any other racial group should be treated any differently. I must have misunderstood. You said Asians had been screwed over by AA. I thought you meant AA should have given them as a minority special treatment as well. However, you'll find that many Asians do indeed want special treatment from affirmative action because of the racial obstacles they had to overcome. According to them, racial bias still exists in the workplace and in society, and Asians still hit a "glass ceiling." The notion of "model minority" is a myth, a stereotype given by whites to silence their calls to action. They fear the elimination of affirmative action is a continuation of whites denying that Asians have real struggles, too. And you don't believe the glass ceiling still exists? ted