Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonder who wrote (2497)	1/21/2003 1:28:15 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15987

I wonder if that "fact" from a fictional movie is wholly reliable, but I don't know for certain. Months. If you look into the reference to the "six- months", someone associated with the IAEA said it, in the '90s, and it looks like a poor job of staff research, misattributing it to a formal report. In the other case, there was definitely no lie. The Czechs told the Administration that there was a meeting, it was the Administration that called it into doubt, later. Bush merely repeated the original report. Yes, we have veto power, but we desire action, in this case. I think they have shared information with Blix, with reservations, due to the possibility of a leak, and with the stipulation that Blix has to make it appear that he found things independently. Israel does not have an aggressive foreign policy, and has menaced no one with a nuke, and it is too trivial to mention US retaliation for activity against the Kurds as a reason to obtain a nuke. Iraq clearly has no reason to pursue such programs without an aggressive design, which is ideologically consistent with his Ba'athism........