SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (67489)1/21/2003 3:24:11 PM
From: paul_philp  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 

I just don't think "offensiveness" at this level, however, is a reason to delete or ban such articles.

Ken is much more subtle than that. Every now and then he has put his arm warmly around my shoulder and quietly suggested that I might want to let something go. Ken has earned my respect so much that I choose to never debate his decisions (about me). As thread coach I trust his judgement more than my own in the heat of battle.

Paul



To: JohnM who wrote (67489)1/21/2003 3:25:35 PM
From: michael97123  Respond to of 281500
 
John,
I for one agree with you, if only for the know thy enemy reason. No he is a scholar, and free speech demands his views be considered too. It would be another thing if this was written by Scott. mike



To: JohnM who wrote (67489)1/21/2003 3:51:32 PM
From: paul_philp  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
John,

Just for my curiosity, let me know what you consider to be the far right - a few samples not a complete list. I consider the Falwell religious right, Pat Buchannan, Bill Bennett, 'pure' libretarians, the militia movement and a few others to be far right.

Thanks,
Paul


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News