Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonder who wrote (14677)	1/22/2003 10:10:53 AM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

The problem is not that I don't understand what you are saying Z, I do. The problem is that from the very beginning you have failed to grasp the basic philosophical/scientific axiom that "out of nothing nothing comes" I have read some of Hawking's book and I understand on a rudimentary level what is being claimed. A primordial universe is not nothing, its something. I tried to tell you that your "nothing" was actually a something but you would not listen. Try reading for comprehension instead of just blithely parroting what you think it says. This is T.P. link, not mine. image.gsfc.nasa.gov So where did it come from? There are only two options as I repeatedly have said. Either a self existent source, or spontaneous generation. I'm sorry I called you a moron that was uncalled for. I just don't think you have a firm grasp of your own position and I know you don't have a grasp of what I have been saying so lets leave it at that. Greg