SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (3194)1/22/2003 5:53:26 PM
From: Machaon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
<< It is ludicrous to believe he is no threat to the United States ... >>

I agree. Saddamn is an obvious threat.

Iraq......Iran......North Korea, among others. All dealing with dangerous weapons and all supporting terrorist organizations.

Can we avoid another direct hit on America?

Should we be proactive, or should we wait until a significant attack against America, or one of our allies, before we take proactive action?



To: Dan B. who wrote (3194)1/22/2003 11:44:50 PM
From: PartyTime  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
DanB--Simply put, Bush has not proved his case for war. Had he done so, he'd have greater worldwide support. As it is, he's rapidly losing what domestic support he initially had. Please don't blame me for what he's failed to do.

Again, for the record, I am no fan of Saddam Hussein. He's a tryant dictator and I don't like any dictators, especially tyrant-like ones.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News