Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (4075)	1/22/2003 8:45:45 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7720

<< Nofe that over the year ... >> Nofe it yourself. Actually, it is not important, to me, anymore, whether we consider a fetus, or embryo, a person or not. As you say, we are currently discussing a legal issue and not a moral one. I think the important issue, is whether we can force a woman to be a host for an embryo or fetus. If so, can we also force a woman to be host for other things. For instance, if we find out, that, through genetic engineering, that we can grow body parts, but, we can only do so in the body of women, should the government be also able to force women to carry and host body parts, besides be hosts for unwanted embryos and fetuses?