Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (4076)	1/22/2003 8:56:56 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7720

<< ... but most people would not consider freezing junior, even if he could later be thawed safely, ... >> Sorry. But, when I think of freezing junior, I think of some of the kids in my neighborhood. I feel like going to the parents and screaming at them, "Why didn't you have an abortion, when you had the chance"! But, you are changing the subject. But, to an interesting idea. If you give birth to, let's say, one of the little cretins that lives down the street from me, and you find out that you have made a big mistake, ala the bad seed type; you should be allowed to reverse the process somehow. Perhaps freezing? It wouldn't be murder, and possibly, the world would be destroyed before the little brats thawed out. << The responsibility can only be transferred if someone else willingly takes it on. >> I was suggesting that we use people like PROLIFE as permanent hosts. What does willingly have to do with it?