SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The New Qualcomm - write what you like thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (5662)1/24/2003 5:19:26 PM
From: Jon Koplik  Respond to of 12253
 
Big Macs Can Make You Fat? No Kidding, a Judge Rules

January 23, 2003
By BENJAMIN WEISER

A federal judge in Manhattan dismissed a lawsuit yesterday
that sought to hold the McDonald's Corporation liable for
obesity and ill health in teenagers.

The suit, which had not reached trial, sought class-action
status on behalf of potentially millions of children and
teenagers who buy McDonald's hamburgers, French fries and
other products. The suit accused the fast-food chain of
deceiving consumers about the high levels of fat, sugar,
salt and cholesterol in its products.

The judge, Robert W. Sweet of Federal District Court, said
there was no evidence that McDonald's had concealed
information about its ingredients, and he said it was
widely known that fast food, and McDonald's products in
particular, contained high levels of such potentially
harmful ingredients.

"If a person knows or should know that eating copious
orders of supersized McDonald's products is unhealthy and
may result in weight gain," Judge Sweet wrote, "it is not
the place of the law to protect them from their own
excesses."

He added wryly: "Nobody is forced to eat at McDonald's.
(Except, perhaps, parents of small children who desire
McDonald's food, toy promotions or playgrounds, and demand
their parents' accompaniment.)"

The judge observed that the case raised "challenging
issues," and said it was apparently the first such suit to
reach a definitive decision. He said the case had the
potential to spawn thousands of similar suits, noting that
Americans spend more than $110 billion a year on fast food.

But, he said, "This opinion is guided by the principle that
legal consequences should not attach to the consumption of
hamburgers and other fast-food fare unless consumers are
unaware of the dangers of eating such food." He also
dismissed claims that McDonald's foods were dangerous
because they were addictive.

McDonald's praised the ruling. "Common sense has
prevailed," the company said in a statement.

The company said it has consistently maintained that the
lawsuit was frivolous. "Today's ruling confirms that fact,"
it said.

The suit was originally filed on behalf of two teenagers
who said in affidavits last fall that they were regular
McDonald's customers. Ashley Pelman, 14, of the Bronx, is
4-foot-10 and weighs 170 pounds. Jazlyn Bradley, 19, of
Brooklyn, is 5-foot-6 and weighs 270 pounds.

Their lawyer, Samuel Hirsch, said the court had given the
case a fair hearing. He added that he intended to file an
amended suit in line with one aspect of the ruling, in
which Judge Sweet suggested one avenue by which such a suit
might be pursued.

The judge said that such a complaint could accuse
McDonald's of altering its food during processing, thus
creating an "entirely different - and more dangerous - food
than one would expect" at home or in a restaurant other
than McDonald's.

The judge noted, for example, that Chicken McNuggets,
rather than being merely chicken fried in a pan, are what
he called "a McFrankenstein creation of various elements
not utilized by the home cook."

Such an argument, the judge added, "may establish that the
dangers of McDonald's products were not commonly
well-known, and thus that McDonald's had a duty toward its
customers."

McDonald's argued that it was known that processing food
can make it more harmful. The judge did not say how he
might rule on such an allegation.

Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company.