SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : January Effect 2003 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Q. who wrote (112)1/24/2003 10:29:25 AM
From: semi_infinite   Respond to of 666
 
yep. je is over.



To: Q. who wrote (112)1/24/2003 10:44:53 AM
From: RockyBalboa  Respond to of 666
 
I sold also many stock, on top of that I planned to short a few, and did so in RBAK.

the portfolio is therefore a bit in the plus (there is also a small shortcoming in the SI portfolio - it has not changed the FAO ticker therefore it is all valued with zero).

I have added back one stock, it is AVAN. Charting is a bit nasty lastly but the volume is good and the anthrax/plague news "promising", to say the least.

I will, like you report the returns on the February Friday - with one exception: the mentioned (and unlucky) FAOOQ sale at 30c.

Your portfolio did better than mine this year: I'm behind 7.5% (adding $570, but subtracting $1000 for FAOO).



To: Q. who wrote (112)2/1/2003 12:10:56 PM
From: RockyBalboa  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 666
 
'BAD-TASTING SOUP'
Not much of the january effect - here's one reason why:

Funds Expect First Jan Outflows Since '90
Saturday February 1, 7:19 am ET
By Kathie O'Donnell

BOSTON (Reuters) - Investors are expected to pull more money out of stock funds this month than they put in, which would be the first time that's happened in January since 1990, the latest data shows.

Stock funds open to U.S. investors are expected to post $8.8 billion of net outflows this month based on estimates from TrimTabs.com Investment Research Inc.

In January 1990, outflows totaled $274 million, according to the Investment Company Institute. Since 1984, when current fund categories were set, only twice -- in 1990 and 1988 -- has cash flowed out of stock funds during January, ICI said.

January's historically strong stock fund inflows have been fueled partly by workers investing year-end bonuses. With many companies cutting jobs, bonuses have shrunk, and investors with extra cash are more likely to spend it on something other than the risky stock market or accept skimpy returns from bond and money market funds, analysts said.

Peter Crane, vice president and managing editor of iMoneyNet Inc., publisher of the Money Fund Report, said on Thursday investors are always evaluating their holdings.

"I might get 1 percent on a money fund. In that case, I'd rather have a vacation."

Money-market funds have netted $36.9 billion this month through Tuesday, putting them on pace for the lowest January inflow in six years, Crane said.

"The biggest factor is that the economy is just generating less cash," he said, adding that lower interest rates also mean bond and money market funds have provided less income for investors. The average stock fund is also down. "So it's sort of self-feeding."

At the start of 2001, when money funds were yielding 6 percent and money fund assets totaled about $2 trillion, that meant about $120 billion a year, or about $10 billion a month, in income was paid out to investors. Now, with money funds yielding less than 1 percent, less than $20 billion a year is generated in income, Crane said.

'BAD-TASTING SOUP'

"You also have people that I would assume aren't even bothering to put money in a money fund," he said. "With yields below 1 percent, they'll get their check and put it in their checking account at the bank."

Don Cassidy, a senior analyst at Lipper Inc., said bond funds could continue to attract investor cash. Bond funds netted a record $132 billion last year, according to Lipper data.

For equity funds, the outlook remains "touch and go," he said. The average U.S. diversified stock fund lost 22 percent last year, Lipper said.

"It's a bad-tasting soup overall, low bonuses, people scared about their jobs," Cassidy said, adding that investors are waiting to see whether the U.S. will declare war on Iraq. "People are thinking, 'Oh boy, is another bottom coming or are we going to go lower'."

If investors do buy equity funds -- balanced funds, which invest in both stocks and bonds or value funds are the most likely candidates to receive the bulk of the cash, Cassidy said.

"It wouldn't be surprising to me to see a shop like Janus continue to see some outflows," Cassidy said. "Of course, Pimco does very well because they are bond (oriented)."

Janus Capital Group Inc.'s (NYSE:JNS - News) retail stock and bond funds had $14.2 billion of net outflows last year, second to Putnam Investments, which lost $15.7 billion, Financial Research Corp., a financial services consulting firm, said.

IMoneyNet's Crane expects bond funds to hold more appeal for investors than stock or money funds this year, he said.

"But given mutual fund flows' historical record of predicting market returns, that's not good news for the bond market," he said.