Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (158863)	1/24/2003 6:42:15 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1580442

The article you lined to didn't seem to be a version of what happened in the case. It was rather a report of the hearings going on now and only made a small refrence to the case. It didn't refute any idea presented in the National Review articles or provide much detail or any new theory about what supposedly happened. Refute, may be not but there was a difference in what transpired. In the Congressional version, Pickering made a motion for a new trail. In the NR's version, Pickering reduced the sentence. ted ted