SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Attack Iraq? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (3410)1/25/2003 8:29:59 AM
From: Stephen O  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8683
 
Teen sex scandal returns to haunt anti-war pundit
Former UN inspector Scott Ritter cancels Baghdad visit
nationalpost.com
Peter Goodspeed
National Post

Friday, January 24, 2003
ADVERTISEMENT


Scott Ritter has a knack for making headlines.

The 6-foot, 4-inch, former U.S. Marine and Gulf War veteran first came to the world's attention as an aggressive United Nation's weapons inspector bent on searching for weapons of mass destruction in Baghdad. He later underwent a dramatic change of heart and became one of the most vocal critics of current U.S. foreign policy in Iraq.

But this week, Mr. Ritter's public life suddenly self-destructed, when it became known he was arrested two years ago in a police Internet sex sting operation for trying to meet a 16-year-old girl he had approached in an online chat room.

The resulting scandal has all but neutralized Mr. Ritter's involvement in the anti-war movement and forced him to abort plans to travel to Baghdad this week to protest a threatened U.S. invasion.

The former military intelligence officer and ballistic missile expert has been thrown on the defensive and angrily refuses to discuss the allegations of sexual misconduct.

He insists he has been "held accountable before the law" and "stood before a judge in open court" and had the charges against him dismissed.

Earlier this week, two newspapers, the Schenectady Daily Gazette and the New York Daily News reported Mr. Ritter was arrested in June, 2001, for allegedly having an online sexual discussion with someone he thought was an underage girl. When he arranged to meet her at a local Burger King restaurant, she turned out to be an undercover policeman who had been posing online as a minor.

Mr. Ritter was charged, under his official name -- William S. Ritter -- with attempted endangerment of a child, a misdemeanor that carries a maximum sentence of 90 days in jail. When the case came before the courts, it was "adjourned in contemplation of dismissal," which means the charges were to be dropped if Mr. Ritter stayed out of trouble for six months.

According to a local television news report, Mr. Ritter underwent court-ordered sex offender counselling from an Albany, N.Y., psychologist. Afterwards, the charges against him were sealed, meaning the court could no longer make information on the case public.

According to a report in the Albany Times Union, Mr. Ritter had another brush with the law in April, 2001, when he tried to meet someone he thought was a 14-year-old girl whom he had met in another on-line discussion group.

That case was also a police sting operation but no charges were ever laid against Mr. Ritter.

Mr. Ritter refuses to discuss details of either case, saying he is "obligated, both ethically and legally, not to."

He does, however, question the timing of news leaks of his arrest, saying they were intended to discredit him and blunt his criticism of American policy on Iraq.

A day before news of Mr. Ritter's sex scandal broke, he was publicly calling for the impeachment of George W. Bush, the U.S. President, accusing him of involving the U.S. in a war Mr. Ritter regards as "illegal and based on a foundation of lies."

Mr. Ritter claims "Iraq is a defanged tiger" and insists Saddam Hussein's chemical, biological and nuclear weapons program is either accounted for or destroyed.

In 1998, after seven years as a UN weapons inspector in Iraq, Mr. Ritter sang a different tune when he resigned in a fit of public pique, warning that the UN Security Council was caving in to Iraq's demands that certain "sensitive sites," such as presidential palaces, not be inspected.

Then, he warned that Iraq was insufficiently disarmed and ready to restart its nuclear and biological weapons programs as soon as the UN turned its back. To compel Iraq into compliance, he said: "Iraq should be subjected to a major campaign that seeks to destroy the regime of Saddam Hussein."

The outspoken Mr. Ritter became a regular on U.S. television news and talk shows and testified before U.S. congressional committees.

But over time, he became increasingly critical of U.S. policies.

At one point he accused Washington of damaging the inspection process by using intelligence from UN inspectors to determine subsequent bombing targets. He later made a documentary harshly critical of UN sanctions against Iraq.

Last December another documentary, In Shifting Sands, which Mr. Ritter wrote and produced, opened in New York. It argues UN inspectors have already searched every nook and cranny of Iraq.

A wealthy Iraqi-American businessman, Shakir al-Khafaji, is said to have contributed $400,000 toward the costs of making the film.

While he has publicly urged Iraq to co-operate with UN weapons inspectors, becoming the first American to address Iraq's parliament, Mr. Ritter has reserved most of his criticism for the U.S. He insists: "When you go to war, you open up a Pandora's box, the results of which cannot be predicted."

But now his personal campaign against a war in Iraq has been sidelined, possibly permanently, by news of the sex scandal.

"If I went to Baghdad and tried to talk responsibly about issues of war and peace, this issue would have come up," he told CNN Wednesday. "It would have been a distraction and it would have actually been a disservice."

pgoodspeed@nationalpost.com



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (3410)1/25/2003 8:33:08 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 8683
 
Why is the military NOT completely in support of a potential war against Iraq...?

Role Reversal: Bush Wants War, Pentagon Urges Caution
From Capitol Hill Blue | CHB Investigates. . .
By Doug Thompson
Wednesday 22 January 2003

Senior Pentagon officials are quietly urging President George W. Bush to slow down his headlong rush to war with Iraq, complaining the administration's course of action represents too much of a shift of America's longstanding "no first strike'' policy and that the move could well result in conflicts with other Arab nations.

"We have a dangerous role reversal here,'' one Pentagon source tells Capitol Hill Blue. "The civilians are urging war and the uniformed officers are urging caution.''

Capitol Hill Blue has learned the Joint Chiefs of Staff are split over plans to invade Iraq in the coming weeks. They have asked Secretary of Defense Donald Rumseld to urge Bush to back down from his hard line stance until United Nations weapons inspectors can finish their jobs and the U.S. can build a stronger coalition in the Middle East.

"This is not Desert Storm,'' one of the Joint Chiefs is reported to have told Rumseld. "We don't have the backing of other Middle Eastern nations. We don't have the backing of any of our allies except Britain and we're advocating a policy that says we will invade another nation that is not currently attacking us or invading any of our allies.''

Intelligenced sources say some Arab nations have told US diplomats they may side with Iraq if the U.S. attacks without the backing of the United Nations. Secretary of State Colin Powell agrees with his former colleagues at the Pentagon and has told the President he may be pursuing a "dangerous course."

An angry Rumsfeld, who backs Bush without question, is said to have told the Joint Chiefs to get in line or find other jobs. Bush is also said to be "extremely angry'' at what he perceives as growing Pentagon opposition to his role as Commander in Chief.

"The President considers this nation to be at war,'' a White House source says,'' and, as such, considers any opposition to his policies to be no less than an act of treason.''

But conversations with sources within the Bush administration, the Pentagon, the FBI and the intelligence community indicate a deepening rift between the professionals who wage war for a living and the administration civilians to want to send them into battle.

Sources say the White House has ordered the FBI and CIA to "find and document'' links between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden, the mastermind of the 9-11 terrorist attacks.

"The implication is clear,'' grumbles one longtime FBI agent. "Find a link, any link, no matter how vague or unproven, and then use that link to justify action against Iraq.''

While Hussein and Iraq have been linked to various terrorist groups in the past, U.S. intelligence agencies have not been able to establish a provable link with bin Laden's al Qaeda forces.

"There may be one,'' says another FBI source. "There should be one. All logic says there has to be one, but we haven't established it as a fact. Not yet.''

Pentagon planners privately refer to the pending Iraq conflict as a "Bush league war,'' something that may be fought more for political gain than anything else.

"During Desert Storm, the line officers wanted to finish the job, wanted to march into Iraq and take out Hussein and his government, but President Bush and JOC Chairman (Colin) Powell pulled the plug on the operation,'' says one Pentagon officer. "We had our chance. We had the justification. We had the support. We don't have it now.''

Some Pentagon staffers point to last weekend's antiwar rally in Washington, where they say the crowd included many veterans of Desert Storm.

"This wasn't just a bunch of tree huggers and longhairs marching,'' says Arnold Giftos of Huntington, West Virginia, who served in Desert Storm and who came to march. "Go to any meeting of veterans groups in this country and you will see serious discussion on whether or not we should be getting into this war.''

Reporters covering the marches on Saturday and Sunday say they counted about 500 marchers among the 30,000 who carried signs or other items identifying themselves as veterans.

"I served in Vietnam,'' said Robert Brighton of Detroit, who marched in Washington. "I supported Desert Storm. I don't support this. It's madness.''

In addition, Capitol Hill Blue has learned that both House Speaker Dennis J. Hastert and Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist have told the White House that they have "increasing'' numbers of Republicans in both Houses raising doubts about the war.

"Nobody in the party wants to come out publicly and tell the President he's wrong,'' says one Hill source close to the GOP leadership, "but we don't have the kind of unity we need on this thing. It could blow apart on us at any time.''

Public support for a war with Iraq is also slipping. In November of 2001, just two months after the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, 78 percent of Americans favored military action against Iraq. That support has slipped to as low as 52 percent in January polls. A Washington Post-ABC news poll taken last week shows Americans evenly split over Bush's handling of the crisis with Iraq.

Spokesmen for the White House, Pentagon and Congressional leadership offices would not comment on the record for this report.

truthout.org