SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rascal who wrote (68771)1/25/2003 3:53:46 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Respond to of 281500
 
Yes, even without knowing whether he was a real defector or working for Saddam, it was awful. At least it made the news - though I notice that CNN did not headline it properly. The mainstream media still lend an air of legitimacy to the UN that it has not deserved.



To: Rascal who wrote (68771)1/25/2003 6:12:32 PM
From: unclewest  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
They should have said he was a scientist, wishing to talk and then saved him.

There may be another villain in this event besides the weapons inspectors.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News