IN THE MONEY: Buyout Talk Won't Help Charter Comm Holders
24 Jan 16:22
By Michael Rapoport A Dow Jones Newswires Column NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--It sounds like good news for Charter Communications Inc.'s (CHTR) beleaguered shareholders, but it really isn't. In fact, if it comes to pass, it'd be about as bad as it gets.
Several private-equity firms are reportedly mulling the idea of buying control of Charter, the troubled, debt-laden cable-TV company now controlled by billionaire Paul Allen. Goldman Sachs Capital Partners, Thomas H. Lee Partners and The Carlyle Group are among the names bandied about as potential investors, in what TheDeal.com said could be bids of more than $1 billion to gain control of Charter. (All three firms declined to comment.) Wait - isn't that good news? Maybe, for Charter itself. But Charter's shareholders should take this buyout talk as a sign to run, not walk, to the nearest exit, dispose of their shares, and be thankful they can still get about a buck and a quarter for them.
Because a private-equity buyout of Charter will almost certainly involve one of two things, and perhaps both: A Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing, or an exchange of a big chunk of Charter's $20 billion debt load for new equity in the company. Either one would be a disaster for shareholders, since bankruptcy typically results in existing common shares becoming worthless, and a big debt-to-equity swap would dilute the value of Charter's existing shares so much that they'd be virtually worthless.
A Charter spokesman couldn't be reached for comment. But to see how and why this would happen, put yourself in the shoes of one of these prospective bidders.
Say you like Charter as a business, and you've decided to pump in $1 billion in exchange for control of the company. But if that's ALL you do, then you've got a problem: Charter's enormous huge load is now effectively your responsibility. Naturally, you're goingto want to get rid of some of that debt before you agree to invest.
The only way to do that is to negotiate with the bondholders and come up with a way to restructure Charter's debt and lighten its load. In a situation like this, that's often done through a prepackaged Chapter 11 filing - an agreement between Charter and its creditors on a plan to reorganize the company that will be implemented through a quick, in-and-out trip to bankruptcy court. (As quick as trips to bankruptcy court get, anyway; it still could take months.) The outside investor would get control of Charter, the bondholders would get minority stakes in the company... and the existing common shareholders would wind up with little if anything.
Even if there isn't a bankruptcy, however, Charter needs to get its debt under control. Standard & Poor's, Moody's Investors Service and analysts have all openly suggested that such a debt restructuring may be needed. But a restructuring doesn't come for free; to persuade debtholders to give up some of that debt and ease the company's burden, you've got to give them something. The most likely possibility is a big debt-for-equity swap.
Moody's has suggested that Charter needs to reduce its debt by $5 billion to $6 billion. Let's assume for the sake of argument that that debt is converted into equity, not even at full value, but at 45 cents on the dollar - that's roughly the level at which Charter's largest note issue is currently trading, so that suggests the amount that current buyers of the notes expect to realize for their investment.
Under this scenario, then, maybe $2.5 billion of new equity would have to be issued to reduce the debt by the amount required. And since Charter's current market capitalization is only about $360 million, the new shares would dilute the value of the existing shares almost into oblivion. If $2.5 billion of new shares are issued to creditors in a debt-for-equity swap, that would leave existing shareholders with only 12.6% of the company's equity, instead of 100%.
If you convert that debt to equity using the current going rate on Charter's bank debt, roughly 85 cents on the dollar, it looks even more depressing for shareholders. That means that in a debt-for-equity swap to reduce debt by $5 billion to $6 billion, you'd issue at least $4.25 billion in new equity. Now you'd need a microscope to find that existing $360 million.
In other words, shareholders might wind up with zero value for their shares if the company goes into bankruptcy, or a small fraction of their current value if it doesn't. Heck of a choice.
Now, while a Charter debt restructuring looks inevitable, a huge loss of value for common shareholders doesn't have to happen. This outside interest started when Charter suggested that Allen himself might take the company private; in theory, Allen could simply buy the Charter shares he doesn't already own, presumably for at least market value, and take upon himself the responsibility for getting the debt restructured. (Of course, if Allen were going to do that, the question becomes: Why hasn't he done it already? Because he knows what's going to happen to the equity, that's why; if he wants to invest more in Charter, he'd be smarter to buy the debt.) And there's always at least the chance, however unlikely, that a debt restructuring agreed to early enough and implemented through Chapter 11 CAN preserve value for shareholders. The most prominent example here is Covad Communications Group Inc. (COVD), whose shareholders retained 80% of the company when it emerged from bankruptcy in 2001, after creditors agreed to restructure the debt before the Chapter 11 filing. Of course, Covad had only $1.4 billion in debt to worry about, not $20 billion, making it a little easier to preserve value for shareholders.
Still, the chances that this is going to turn out well for shareholders don't look good. And while the potential interest in investing in Charter is said to be in the early stages, the clock is ticking. Shareholders may want to act now; if they wait till later, it may be too late.
- Michael Rapoport, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-5976; michael.rapoport@dowjones.com (Janet Whitman and Nicole Bullock also contributed to this story.) (END) Dow Jones Newswires 01-24-03 1622ET |