Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (159024)	1/27/2003 5:07:34 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1580256

While the case was ongoing, he made contact with the Justice Dept [I think it was them] without counsel present. That's in violation of judicial law that governs the behavior of judges. You are stuck on this insignificant point; judges make so-called ex parte communications all the time -- the question is one of substance. They do? The recipient of the contact has repeatedly stated he did not believe the phone call was inappropriate, it was merely a call to double-check the sentencing guidelines. Once again, Pickering went all out, including violating the laws that govern his behavior, for what sounds to be a borderline criminal and a racist. Why? From what I see of Pickering's history, laws don't mean much to him. Do you think that's a good qualification for a judge? You are doing everything you can to manufacturer a racist claim against this guy. The evidence is all there.......I had to do nothing more than a google search. Unfortunately, you are doing all you can to defend the sucker......that's the pity of it. ted