SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stockman_scott who wrote (69708)1/29/2003 1:35:36 AM
From: Sea Otter  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
A question for stockman and others ....

If the U.S. presents clear evidence that Saddam has
WMD's AND the U.S. presents clear evidence of operational
ties between Iraq and Al-Qeada, would you support the war?
Yes or no?

If the above two premises are proven true (Saddam has
WMDs and has proven terrorist ties to the 9/11 crowd), then I can't see any logic in remaining anti-war.
For the grim fact would then be that our existence is
truly at stake. And that's certainly a good reason for
starting a war - survival. Do you agree, or no?



To: stockman_scott who wrote (69708)1/29/2003 11:16:28 AM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
The Empire Strikes First
By MAUREEN DOWD
Columnist


Not a bad column.