SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rascal who wrote (69790)1/29/2003 1:39:47 PM
From: Rollcast...  Respond to of 281500
 
good speaker was because of the teleprompter and practice, practice practice

Yes yes, teleprompters and practice have been elements of many good speeches by many good and bad speakers for decades.

Besides your usual veiled cheap shots - did you have a point? BTW, I was speaking about message, structure, and delivery - not opinions on content.

I hope you are a better job of politics than politicians

And I hope to see an opinion from you someday that doesn't start and end with your feelings about Bush.



To: Rascal who wrote (69790)1/29/2003 2:14:17 PM
From: bela_ghoulashi  Respond to of 281500
 
Too bad you didn't write the speech, eh?



To: Rascal who wrote (69790)1/29/2003 3:22:22 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 281500
 
Too bad he didn't mention


Other than that, did you enjoy the evening, Mrs. Lincoln?

lindybill@snarl.com



To: Rascal who wrote (69790)1/29/2003 7:07:30 PM
From: Rollcast...  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Speech Watchers React Positively to Bush's Call to Arms
But are dubious about president's economic program

gallup.com

by David W. Moore
GALLUP NEWS SERVICE

PRINCETON, NJ -- An instant reaction poll of speech watchers last night found President George W. Bush receiving high marks for his State of the Union address, although considerably lower than last year. The speech appears to have persuaded many viewers about the need for an invasion of Iraq, but viewers are dubious about the impact of Bush's economic program. When asked which issue was more important to them in the president's speech, respondents chose terrorism and Iraq over the economy by a 56% to 31% margin.

The major findings of the CNN/USA Today/Gallup instant reaction poll are as follows:

Eighty-four percent of speech watchers say their overall reaction to the speech is positive, with 50% saying "very" positive. Last year, 94% said positive, with 74% very positive.
Forty-four percent say that as a result of the speech, they have more confidence that the United States will be able to deal with the problems it has to face, while 7% say they have less confidence, and 47% say the same amount of confidence.
Seventy-one percent say the policies being proposed by Bush would move the country in the right direction, while 20% say the wrong direction. Last year the comparable numbers were 91% vs. 7% respectively. Still, the results last night represent an improvement over this same group's responses in a poll conducted in the days just prior to the speech, when 52% said the right direction and 40% said the wrong direction.
By a margin of 67% to 30%, speech watchers say Bush has made a convincing case about the need for the United States to take military action against Iraq. Prior to the speech, this same group of Americans was about evenly divided, with just 47% saying Bush had made a convincing case for military action and 52% saying he had not.
Speech watchers are dubious about the economic program Bush presented in his speech: 49% say the program is likely to get the country out of its current economic problems, while 43% say it will not. Last year, speech watchers were far more optimistic about Bush's economic program, with 73% expecting his program to work and just 22% saying it would not. When the elder President Bush delivered his State of the Union address in 1992, in the midst of a recession, the speech watchers then reacted in a similar way to last night's speech watchers: 47% thought the elder Bush's economic program would work, while 47% did not.
Most speech watchers, 61%, say their confidence in Bush's economic leadership has not changed as a result of the speech. Another 28% say they have more confidence and 10% say less confidence. In 1992, speech watchers reacted quite similarly: 32% said more confidence and 9% said less confidence, with 58% saying no change.
Speech watchers are much more positive about Bush's arguments for his tax cuts and the changes he has proposed for Medicare. By 67% to 23%, viewers say Bush made a convincing case for the changes in Medicare, and by 58% to 36%, they say he made a convincing case for the tax cuts.
Although a recent Gallup Poll found Americans saying that the economy is more important than Iraq to the country as a whole, by 52% to 37%, speech watchers were more interested in what Bush had to say about Iraq and terrorism than about the economy -- by a 56% to 31% margin.
Republicans Outnumbered Democrats Among Speech Watchers

Typically, presidential speech watchers disproportionately identify with the party of the president. Last night, the imbalance in favor of the president's party was about average, with 40% of respondents identifying as Republicans, 31% as independents, and 28% as Democrats. That 12-percentage-point Republican advantage over Democrats is much smaller than last year's margin, when 50% of speech watchers were Republicans and 25% each were independents and Democrats.

Among those who watched President Clinton's speeches, Democrats outnumbered Republicans by margins that ranged from 7 to 15 percentage points. When the senior Bush gave his last State of the Union address, Republicans outnumbered Democrats in the post-speech poll by just 6 percentage points, 37% to 31%. An instant reaction poll to George W. Bush's first major speech to the nation in February 2001 found a large Republican skew in the audience similar to that for last year's State of the Union address.

Survey Methods

Results are based on telephone interviews with -- 440 -- speech watchers, aged 18+, conducted Jan. 28, 2003. For results based on the total sample of speech watchers, one can say with 95% confidence that the margin of sampling error is ±5 percentage points.

Survey respondents were first interviewed as part of random national adult samples by Gallup between Jan. 20-27, 2003, at which time they indicated they planned to watch the President's 2003 State of the Union address and were willing to be re-interviewed by Gallup after the speech. Respondents' pre- and post-speech answers are shown for those questions that were asked on both surveys.

The sample consists of 40% of respondents who identify themselves as Republicans, 28% who identify themselves as Democrats, and 31% who identify themselves as independents.

Polls conducted entirely in one day, such as this one, are subject to additional error or bias not found in polls conducted over several days...

******************************

Should be at 80% after Powell's turn.

rc@thatsgottahurtouch.com