Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: slacker711 who wrote (69845)	1/29/2003 12:16:09 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

Slacker, Dont you get it "...they seem to equivocate 9/11 with the Gulf War I, Panama and the Vietnam War. They also seem to come out against our attack of Afghanistan." The US is always wrong in Scotts eyes, unless clinton is president. I dont see you mentioning serbia, bosnia, somalia in that mix. Its all very sad. Conservatives brought some of this on themselves with the unrelenting anti clintonism when he was president. Now its payback time and the hell with US interests, patriotism or any of that bunk. Mike@yesitsgettingabitundermyskintoday.com

To: slacker711 who wrote (69845)	1/29/2003 3:53:54 PM
From: LindyBill	Respond to of 281500

The "Not in our Name" Crowd goes by 911 like a speed bump. And then repeats the pro-Palestinian mantra. Sounds like Chomsky wrote it. >>>>We too mourned the thousands of innocent dead and shook our heads at the terrible scenes of carnage -- even as we recalled similar scenes in Baghdad, Panama City, and, a generation ago, Vietnam....... not only attacked Afghanistan but arrogated to itself and its allies the right to rain down military force anywhere and anytime. The brutal repercussions have been felt from the Philippines to Palestine, where Israeli tanks and bulldozers have left a terrible trail of death and destruction.....<<<<<<