SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Fred Levine who wrote (67459)1/29/2003 2:29:33 PM
From: BWAC  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
<What would you and the world have said if we attacked Afghanistan pre-9/11?>

Had a clear and factual threat been made prior to 9/11?

After you get your point made. Can you ask these questions? Would attacking Afghanistan prior to 9/11 have actually prevented the events of 9/11? Can you say it would have in any certainty?



To: Fred Levine who wrote (67459)1/30/2003 5:14:29 AM
From: zonder  Respond to of 70976
 
didn't we have a treaty with Saddam to allow inspections?


Yes. And he is allowing inspections.

Inspectors are going to WHEREVER they want, and asking WHATEVER questions they want, and taking samples from WHEREVER they want.

Your conviction that Iraq is NOT allowing inspections is based ONLY on Blix's statement that he does not "feel" like Saddam has fully accepted disarmement.

How is THAT grounds for a war?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News