SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Applied Materials No-Politics Thread (AMAT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cary Salsberg who wrote (5211)1/30/2003 8:24:59 AM
From: advocatedevil  Respond to of 25522
 
"Applied to axe 165 jobs in Texas, says report"

By Semiconductor Business News
January 30, 2003
URL: siliconstrategies.com

AUSTIN, Texas--In what could be its fifth layoff in last 18 months, Applied Materials Inc. plans to reduce its headcount by 165 employees in Austin, Texas, over the next two months, according to a report from the Austin Business Journal here on Wednesday.

On Wednesday, the chip-equipment giant notified the Texas Workforce Commission that the reductions will be permanent, according to the report. The company employs 2,500 employees in Austin, according to the report.

The Santa Clara, Calif.-based company also plans to undergo a mandatory shutdown for two weeks in the spring, the first week in February in conjunction with President's Day and the second week in March to coincide with the Austin Independent School District's spring break, according to the report.

The Austin Business Journal contacted an Applied spokesman, who declined to comment. The move represents the company's fifth major layoff in the last 18 months. In response to the IC downturn, Applied in November announced its long-awaited and fourth major layoff in the last 16 months, saying it would cut 11% of its workforce, or about 1,750 employees (see Nov. 4, 2002 story ).

AdvocateDevil



To: Cary Salsberg who wrote (5211)1/30/2003 10:56:57 AM
From: willcousa  Respond to of 25522
 
I agree Cary. I also think it is easy to look at a China or a Taiwan's numbers and think that they represent only local consumption when they probably reflect demand from the US and Europe for products manufactured in those asia.