Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (159267)	1/30/2003 5:00:14 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583921

Ted, <And don't give me this bs that I don't like him and so I am not convinceable.> Reading the following paragraph, one would wonder whether you really are convinceable or not: <And btw, I think its hilarious that you all think Sarandon is dumb. Truth is she can out think GW any ole day. I have never brought it up but you do remember when they flew into the WTC bldg and they told GW when he was in that school classroom what had happened..........I have never in my life seen a human whose eyes looked so blank. There wasn't fear, anger, excitement......anything; there was nothing. It suddenly dawned on me that he didn't have a clue what to do......that's why he continued to sit there for a while longer. Oh, later, they spun it that he didn't want to upset the kids but I know that wasn't it........the kids would not have had a clue had he gotten up right away. It scares me the person who sits in the White House.> Other than that, I'm sure you are keeping an open mind when it comes to Bush. <G> Tenchusatsu

To: tejek who wrote (159267)	1/30/2003 10:22:27 AM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1583921

When are we supposed to get the evidence What evidence do you require? We were at war. In order to keep us from "going to Baghdad", Saddam entered into an agreement not to do certain things. He abided by that agreement only so long as he had to; when he realized the United States had elected a weakling, he immediately began violating the agreement. The war should have resumed at the time, but due to Clinton's incompetence, didn't. We now have a strong leader. The war is resumed. This isn't complicated. There exists a group of idiot liberals, led by the Susan Sarandons and Ed Asners of the world, who don't comprehend our country's need to defend itself, and in fact, who would side with our enemies before supporting self defense. "What has Iraq done to us?" What idiots.

To: tejek who wrote (159267)	1/30/2003 12:08:29 PM
From: hmaly	Respond to of 1583921

Ted Re..When are we supposed to get the evidence.......after Iraq has fallen? GW announced that Powell would be presenting the evidence on Feb 5th. Why should we believe GW? For the same reason we all should respect the word of anyone, common courtesy. Do you honestly think the 50% who did not vote for him think he has operated in good faith? The polls are quite clear that most people trust him. And btw, I think its hilarious that you all think Sarandon is dumb. You obviously didn't read my post. I said she doesn't know squat, because she is not privy to classified intelligence. No way did I imply that she was too dumb to understand the intelligence reports, I said she hasn't seen the intelligence reports, and has no idea what information GW is acting upon. Lieberman has seen the classified intelligence and agrees with GW. Doesn't that tell you something. I have never brought it up but you do remember when they flew into the WTC bldg and they told GW when he was in that school classroom what had happened..........I have never in my life seen a human whose eyes looked so blank. There wasn't fear, anger, excitement......anything; there was nothing. It suddenly dawned on me that he didn't have a clue what to do......that's why he continued to sit there for a while longer. Did it ever occur to that less than enormous brain of yours, that the whole nation is grateful that GW, instead of flying off the handle and acting rashly, thought the situation over before he reacted. Wouldn't you want any president to react the same way? And did it ever occur to you that you are now criticizing Gw for reacting too rashly against Iraq after 12 yrs, and yet here you are criticizing Gw for not reacting within seconds in that class room. Does that make any sense to you, and if so, why?