SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: michael97123 who wrote (70216)1/30/2003 11:16:05 AM
From: JohnM  Respond to of 281500
 
Why off topic? Why is it a rant? In my opinion anti war folks are not dealing with the facts that i presented. Actually i am looking for a rebuttal that makes sense to me. Please take another look at that post Ken. Mike

Ken, may still be sleeping in SF, so I'll take a quick shot at answering that one from my point of view, Mike, particularly since you seem to be a nice guy.

Your question doesn't come across as a question, though you may have meant it that way. You characterize folk who raise questions about Bush's invasion plans as "anti-war" which is not accurate; you use the verb "yapping" to describe their talk; and accuse them of keeping their "heads in the sand."

Now, if you were visiting my house and thought you were asking me a serious question with those beginnings and I knew you only as well I now do, I might ask you to leave; but I would certainly ask you why you found it necessary to attack me by way of asking the question.



To: michael97123 who wrote (70216)1/30/2003 11:27:14 AM
From: FaultLine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Why off topic? Why is it a rant?

Go read and discuss some Foriegn Affairs articles and you will see that your protracted discussino of the protesters is Off Topic. Try reading the thread header for more information.

This 'protester": discussion is finished.

--fl