Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (159360)	1/31/2003 1:00:16 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1584048

Ted, more Democrat obstructionism. The Dems in the Judiciary Committee has not come up with one valid reason to hold up Estrada's nomination: Read the article........I am not surprised. Why is he not answering their questions? He's 41......not much experience. This is not rocket science. The GOP seems to want everyone to roll over and play dead when they nominate someone. Well, I know the GOP is doing God's work but the rest of us can still ask questions. If he's as good as the GOP thinks, there should not be a problem. ted

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (159360)	1/31/2003 1:00:16 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1584048

Ted, more Democrat obstructionism. The Dems in the Judiciary Committee has not come up with one valid reason to hold up Estrada's nomination: Read the article........I am not surprised. Why is he not answering their questions? He's 41......not much experience. This is not rocket science. The GOP seems to want everyone to roll over and play dead when they nominate someone. Well, I know the GOP is doing God's work but the rest of us can still ask questions. If he's as good as the GOP thinks, there should not be a problem. ted