SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (172736)1/31/2003 12:19:08 AM
From: Dave Budde  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
So vote with your pocketbook and buy someone else's stock (if you can find a company that is not abusing the option laws...good luck). I'm not disagreeing with you about the exorbitant sums that some of these guys get, but the ones who have been there since for 20+ years deserve to be wealthy. When they are cashing in on options they got 10 years ago it's because they have to since they are expiring. They held them the whole time and didn't have to. Nothing wrong with that.

But if you're looking to change the option laws, you're going about it in the wrong place.

Personally, as one who has benefited from options in the past, I agree with most of what is being said about options. They are too rich and offer not enough risk. But thems the rules in corporate America today.



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (172736)2/4/2003 5:28:31 AM
From: Yousef  Respond to of 186894
 
Jim,

Re: "Shoot...some of these Twerps are getting options on hundreds of thousands
of shares and their divisions are losing money."

Using your "wonderful" logic, Jim ... then ... no one at AMD should
have any options because that company "rarely" turns a profit, right ??!!
We are all waiting to hear you "pontificate" about those "scumbags". LOL

Make It So,
Yousef