Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (172769)	1/31/2003 11:15:22 AM
From: The Duke of URL©	Respond to of 186894

If you really were following this issue of excess stock options, WITH RESPECT TO INTEL, not Disney, you might come to the conclusion that Intel was very stingy with stock options five years ago and that it has been only recently the the issue of Excess Compensation has come up. But, I am glad to know that you are unalterably against excess compensation in general. By the way, do you have an opinion on motherhood? As far as Eisner is concerned, the problem of his compensation has been apparent since at least 1995. If you have been following that company, you would know that Warren Buffett sold his 2.4 MILLION shares in DIS, because of the compensation to Eisner, and to Mike Ovitz, the ex-president of Creative Artists, who became president of Dis after the death of Frank Wells. And, who could not remember the issue of Jeffery Katzenburg who sued dis because Eisner stiffed him on his salary and WON the $500,000,000 cash(!) in court. And today, DIS announced that Eisners comp increased 500% for 2003. But I am sure you knew and posted about this 5 years ago, also. :))