Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert O who wrote (172786)	1/31/2003 2:59:56 PM
From: carl a. mehr	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

I don't agree with your stance on Dunlap. Is is possible that he acted unethically with his technical expertise, in the Intel battle against AMD? This is only a question and perhaps he earned the $10,733,567 in his sale of Intel that he didn't even hold a full day? Earnings to from Intel share holders re-purchased those shares for approximately the same amount of money. Was it a gift of shareholders money or should it be considered "hush money" earned? Switching to Pottruck. Nobody has been able to explain why this Director, CEO of Charles Schwab Corp. was given the right to by 300,000 shares at $1.60 per share. I think Amy J. is getting green with envy about that one. Instead of only getting 1 share for $15.85 she would have getting almost 10 shares. Wouldn't that be a lot better Amy? Well, us Intel share holders paid for the gift to Pottruck. What did Pottruck do to deserve this gift? You may all speak up at once. John Hall, has the cat still got you tongue? Andy Grove, Craig Barrett, Tom Dunlap, David Pottruck, Paul Engel, Tim May, Amy J. and others please speak up...humble carl