Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (70613)	1/31/2003 1:55:38 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

That's like asking What if Clinton had been impotent. "And if wishes were Horses, Beggers would ride." Well, if Clinton was, at least he was getting the right treatment for it. :>) Yeah, the House of Saud is desperate to keep us out of Iraq. They are the reason we did not take out Saddam in 91. Too little, too late, IMO. TWT.

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (70613)	1/31/2003 2:10:23 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

re Bush Is Backing Exile for Hussein Everybody who knows Iraq is saying this is a pipedream, Saddam will never go. Saddam has said, if he gives up power, he will chopped in little pieces by his enemies, and he has great reason for saying so. The list of men desperately wishing to avenge their honor on his person must be long indeed. So this is for diplomatic show, to say to the Arabs, okay? you don't want the war? if you can produce the results, then there won't be a war. But everybody knows the chances are very slim. Probably every Arab leader is praying for a coup.