SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (351427)1/31/2003 7:31:19 PM
From: SecularBull  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Patricia, yes you can have it both ways. Clinton was not interested in balancing the budget, in earnest, until he was repudiated in the '94 elections. Then, all of the sudden, he took credit for fiscal restraint foisted upon him by Congress. You can deny the true facts all you want, but I would think at some point you would be able to sleep better at night admitting the truth. Perhaps you do when you look in the mirror.

~SB~



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (351427)2/1/2003 1:04:11 PM
From: David Howe  Respond to of 769667
 
<< During the economic upturn of the 90's the Republicans said that it was the economic policies of Reagan and Bush that were finally kicking in and affecting the country positively and it really had nothing to do with CLinton...............................now that it turned ugly you blame CLinton.............................you can't have it both ways!!!LOL >>

Both ways? It's the same way, EXACTLY. The economy turns slowly. Expansion follows policies that were made years before the expansion begins. Recessions follow those expansions and recessions are not ended with policies made in a one or two year period.

There is no question that the biggest economic expansion/bubble will be followed by one of the biggest economic/market busts. There is little to nothing that can be done to prevent that in the short run.

This is obvious.

Dave