Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Shuttle Columbia STS-107 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sandintoes who wrote (15)	2/1/2003 11:39:58 AM
From: Carolyn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 627

The question has to be raised, but I don't think any device could have been planted. Capt. Lovell said security at the Cape is just too tight. This is horrible. It brings the Challenger, 9/11, other horrors back to relive.

To: sandintoes who wrote (15)	2/1/2003 11:40:50 AM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 627

IMO, the damned news agencies do more to instill fear than any terrorists. In their efforts to out "scoop" other news agencies the "commentators" about halfway build whatever stories they want, and as is the case most of the time, when they are proved false, they just shrug and go on. Just now a major network said that "at least one New York radio station is reporting the possibility of a terroristic act".....now....how stupid is that? See what I mean?