Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (159710)	2/1/2003 9:50:46 PM
From: hmaly	Respond to of 1580019

All Re..The very fact that I oppose invading Iraq should be answer enough to your silly question So, you are afraid of Saddams's nukes. Figures. You are a poor miserable victim of your president's fear campaign< Hey, I am not the one hiding under my kitchen table, worried that Osama might blow up a few camels in Iraq for reprisals. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. You would like to believe that wouldn't you? Powell is going to offer evidence next Wed. that there is a Al qaeda link. Prove it otherwise.

To: Alighieri who wrote (159710)	2/1/2003 11:14:40 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580019

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. How is this relevant? Bush said, before he was elected, that Iraq needed to be disarmed, and spoke about the Clinton bungle of allowing the inspectors to be kicked out. Bush is, frankly, simply keeping a campaign promise, which was to continue the process of disarming Iraq. Whether Iraq had anything to do with 9/11 really has nothing to do with it. It does appear that Al Queda does have some connection to Iraq, but I just don't see that it matters. The guy is an evil dictator -- just like Milosivec was (only many times more brutal) -- yet you supported action against Miolsivec but not Saddam. Clearly, you are a hypocrit.