SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Shuttle Columbia STS-107 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (60)2/1/2003 3:54:26 PM
From: J.B.C.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 627
 
Yes there is, depends on what the malfunction is. That's why there are several landing sites overseas that have to meet certain weather conditions before the launch can proceed.

Jim



To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (60)2/2/2003 3:33:55 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Respond to of 627
 
Re: do you know if there is a mission abort protocol when a malfunction during lift off is detected?

I have watched previous launched of Shuttle vehicles and there is a "go-no go" decision point about 40 seconds into the flight, as I recall, where the decision is made to ignite the second stage or to abort the mission. Which means that when the debris fell off the booster housing, mission control had less than 40 seconds to decide whether to scrub the mission. Since there would be a standard list of parameters for aborting that couldn't possibly consider every hazard, by following standard operating procedures, the flight would have been allowed to proceed. To do otherwise would have meant taking initiative on the part of a bureaucrat and taking such a decision would have ruined the career of the mission control commander. No matter whether his/her decision saved lives or not.