Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (159783)	2/2/2003 10:46:03 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583980

Get real, both sides are corrupt. I believe there is corruption amongst some Republicans. But at nowhere NEAR the levels that are found with the Democrats. More importantly, I do not believe anyone has been able to come up with a reasonable allegation of corruption within the Bush administration. There is a great deal of lying and innuendo, but I believe the administration has acted in an absolutely appropriate manner.

To: hmaly who wrote (159783)	2/2/2003 1:11:27 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1583980

I am not for Nader at all, though he has his points. National security is critical, but when was the last time Saddam attacked us? I hope Bush is bluffing in order to scare Saddam into fleing his country. Otherwise, I say keep him in a box, inspect the hell out of the place, then try and find one good assassin. Going into a bloodbath in Baghdad is not what we need right now, and it would also put us further into deficit spending. Wars should be just, not at the whim of a president. Even with his rousing speech last week, Bush has no mandate for war. People still want real evidence and more allies. "Almost six in 10, 57 percent, said in the new poll that they would like to see more evidence and that grows to 68 percent if the U.N. weapons inspectors don't find hard evidence on their own."