To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (42815 ) 2/3/2003 6:22:40 PM From: Haim R. Branisteanu Respond to of 52237 Crunch Time for the US$ (Bank of Montreal) Monday, February 3, 2003bmonesbittburns.com The great bull run by the U.S. dollar came to a grinding halt precisely a year ago, laid low by a cornucopia of U.S. economic negatives - dimmed medium-term growth prospects, the rash of corporate scandals, negative interest rate spreads and a runaway trade deficit. From its peak, the greenback has now dropped 13% against a basket of major currencies and seems poised for further weakness (Chart 1). While Treasury Secretary John Snow confirmed this week that he favours a "strong dollar" policy, the reality is that we are now in a "weak dollar" world. Over the next few years, the only strong dollars are likely to be found in New Zealand, Australia and, possibly, Canada. On a broad trade-weighted basis, the decline in the U.S. dollar over the past year was much milder, since it is tied to a number of currencies (such as the Chinese yuan) and it strengthened against the beleaguered Latin American currencies (Chart 2). Indeed, the Canadian dollar is the only currency in the Western Hemisphere that rose against the U.S. dollar in the past year. However, outside of crisis-ravaged South America, the vast majority of currencies posted large gains against the U.S. dollar, led especially by oil-rich Norway and gold-heavy South Africa. The aggressive easing of monetary policy by the Fed over the past two years, squarely aimed at averting deflation, has left the U.S. with some of the lowest short-term interest rates in the world. And, adjusting for underlying inflation trends, U.S. real short-term rates are now deeply negative and the lowest among the major currencies (Table 1). While interest rate spreads were simply not the driving force in the currency market in the late 1990s, as flows were dominated by equity market developments, the renewed focus on fixed-income product has again pushed spreads to the forefront for exchange rate movements. The relative unattractiveness of U.S. interest rates comes at an acutely awkward time for the currency, since the U.S. needs to finance a current account deficit that is headed for almost 5% of GDP this year (Chart 3). Analysts have been crying wolf about the perils of the soaring trade imbalance for years, and it appears that just like the fable, the wolf has finally arrived. History suggests that it will take almost two years for the dollar depreciation to fully work through to impact the trade numbers, and could even have a short-term adverse impact by driving up the cost of imports (the so-called "J-curve" effect). While the world waits for the weaker U.S. dollar to have an impact on trade flows, the U.S. will still need to borrow a net US$500 billion this year. Over the latest four quarters, the massive U.S. current account deficit has been funded by three primary sources: Central Bank purchases of U.S. securities, private purchases of U.S. Treasuries, and private purchases of other securities, especially corporate and agency bonds (Charts 4 and 5). Notably, net foreign direct investment has slipped back into a net outflow, as inward investment has dried up. Given the glacial speed at which the current account reacts, even a slowdown in net purchases of U.S. bonds by foreign investors will hammer the U.S. dollar, to say nothing about the impact on the currency if they began to reduce their holdings. The U.S. dollar story is not entirely bleak. Importantly, both Euroland and Japan are hardly long-term beacons for international capital inflows, as each are saddled with their own set of economic problems. U.S. productivity growth remains the envy of the world, and productivity trends have tended to drive long-term currency moves. A moderate decline in the dollar will give much-needed relief to U.S. manufacturing. In addition, some further softness in the U.S. dollar would not necessarily prove to be poison for domestic financial markets. In the great dollar slide of 1985-87, both stock and bond markets fared quite well - at least until the dollar decline reached crisis proportions by late 1987. A critical task for policymakers in the months and years ahead will therefore be managing a soft-landing for the previously high-flying U.S. dollar. Douglas Porter, CFA, Senior Economist.