Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (159843)	2/2/2003 8:34:55 PM
From: hmaly	Respond to of 1584153

As....Re.Attacking the US, not our allies. Why do you say that. You can bet that if France was attacked by Germany again, France wouldn't want us to wait until Germany attacks us; of course that is France and their snively attitude. We have already saved France twice from Germany twice, and in neither case did Germany attack us first. Same with SK. Now we have treaties with a lot of nations, which say an attack upon one is an attack upon all. Its too bad the Europeans don't want to live up to their end. Actually, Britain could have stayed out of WWII, if Britain didn't have a treaty with France and other European nations. Just think where Europe would be now without Churchills valient stand. Come on now, with that rationale we should attack Iran, Syria, Egypt too. First things first. AFAIK, Syria and Egypt don't do much in the way of terorism anymore, as far as I know. Yes we will try to stop Iran, and SA, and Pakistans support of terrorism. I would hope it doesn't take as drastic of an action as Saddam does, but you can bet pressure will be put upon them..