Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KonKilo who wrote (71086)	2/2/2003 11:05:17 PM
From: kumar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

re invasion of Pakistan : i hope it does not happen. Not from US, not from India. the NWFP (bordering pakistan and afghanistan) has always been a difficult territory to govern. It didnt work for centuries (go back to the days of Ghazni), why would one expect it to work now ?

To: KonKilo who wrote (71086)	2/2/2003 11:11:40 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I think we should invade them because that's where Al Qaeda is. Invade exactly where SC?? Pakistan is a NUCLEAR power with a population of over 130 million people... It MUST be contained, and US allied elements within it's society and government supported in order to oppose militant factions. Again.. the militants have NOTHING to offer but martyrdom to those Pakistanis who follow them. So what is important is that Musharraf has the economic and political support that makes westen modernization a more attractive alternative. Furthermore, he must work to break up the local warlord and tribal power structure, which will require considerable time, effort, and bloodshed. Invading Pakistan with US forces would also be like the US Army invading SE Washington DC in order to take out the Drug Gangs.. Terrorists operate on a decentralized "cell" structure.. The best manner to handle it is through dogged police work and special operations... Putting an army in there would accomplish nothing.. The difference betweem Iraq and Pakistan is that we have SERIOUS ISSUES with Iraq's government, not their people. But in the case of Pakistan, we have less of an issue with their government than we do with a radicalized, but regional population in that country. But should Musharraf's government fall to the militants, THEN I would accept your logic that invasion might be necessary (god forbid).. Hawk