SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Just_Observing who wrote (5061)2/3/2003 3:28:04 PM
From: Just_Observing  Respond to of 25898
 
Pentagon weighs up nuclear option
By Richard Cooper in Washington
February 4 2003

The Pentagon is fast-tracking a program to develop computers that would help decide if nuclear weapons should be used to destroy deep underground arms bunkers or other critical targets.

The program, described in unpublished Pentagon documents, seeks to design an array of high-speed computers that could assess structural data, calculate the amount of force needed, then determine whether a nuclear "bunker buster" is required.

The system would also assess the risk of killing nearby civilians and inflicting other collateral damage, including the spread of radioactive dust and the dispersal of toxic chemicals from weapons in the bunker.

The $US1.26billion ($2.15 billion) program is the latest step in a campaign by some Bush Administration officials and members of Congress to press for a new generation of smaller nuclear weapons.

However, the White House and the Defence Department has declined to comment.

More at

smh.com.au



To: Just_Observing who wrote (5061)2/3/2003 3:31:09 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Respond to of 25898
 
What about the militant Wahhabis in Saudi Arabia and their terrorist sponsored sect - Hamas. They hate the Shiites so expect them to make trouble for a government dominated by the majority Shia.



To: Just_Observing who wrote (5061)2/3/2003 3:41:58 PM
From: PartyTime  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 25898
 
Somehow I think Bush has been waiting more for this to happen than anything the inspectors would find.



To: Just_Observing who wrote (5061)2/4/2003 11:25:29 AM
From: Thomas M.  Respond to of 25898
 
US chooses Saddam's successor

No elections?

Tom