SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (28420)2/5/2003 12:18:52 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Respond to of 74559
 
Au $387 vs Q $367

Zoom, zoom, zoom...

At $450 I'd better start thinking about a short strategy for Au. Then, get lined up at $550, which is double the regular price of gold without the mania. Then, take the plunge [so to speak] at about $700 or maybe $800 depending on the form of frenzy.

Mqurice

PS: Alternatively, Jay was right for the past couple of years and there really is mayhem brewing and a stash of time travel money would be good. [Oh, there's the old time factor in money again]. Well, was definitely right.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (28420)2/5/2003 1:17:23 AM
From: LLCF  Respond to of 74559
 
<$1000 would be a mania of irrational exuberance and infectious greed, >

Naw, fair value is $1426.53

DAK



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (28420)2/5/2003 10:43:42 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Hello Maurice, We hiked to a waterfall and swam in its rock pool this morning. We returned to our friend's beach house after picnic of sausages, cheese and crackers, walked its very long beach, swam, and are now chilling out.

<<Gold $380 vs 10 x QCOM only $367.
Jay, gold has regained a lead over QCOM. I hope you haven't put a Chinese curse on QCOM.>>

I detect much wrong with your investment strategy and wealth preservation tactics by your post.

You are trying to tell the market what to do, whereas I am merely listening to what the market wants to do.

Does it surprise you that gold, the one true money that rules over all cash, should be more highly valued than QCOM? If it does not, then would it surprise you if gold becomes 100x (or 10x 10x) QCOM?

If not, then why do you refuse to make the natural trade, the obvious exchange, the apparent wager, and the effortless bet?

If yes, why yes?

Chugs, Jay