Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (3338)	2/4/2003 8:06:48 PM
From: lorne	Respond to of 15987

Hawk. Yes interesting articles...so why would the USA back someone with this questionable past to lead post saddam iraq? Even if Ahmad Chalabi was framed there will be questions of past guilt. They must have a good reason I suppose.

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (3338)	2/4/2003 8:22:02 PM
From: lorne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15987

Hawk. Many posters here and elsewhere say sanctions work against iraq or we need more resolutions before war against iraq. Now the question that comes to mind is why are there still sanctions in place after 12 years? I mean if saddam had complied with UN resolutions why were sanctions not lifted years ago. It should be obvious to anyone that the UN believes that saddam still has WMD otherwise there would be no sanctions? Appears to me that the UN is bent on self destruction along with crazy saddam.